@article{Cruz Saldivar_2014, title={Is there only one effective sui generis protection that meets the obligation set out in article 27(3)(b) of trips?}, url={https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/3909}, abstractNote={<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><span style="font-family: ’Times New Roman’,’serif’; font-size: 10pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US">In view of a wide use of alternative plant variety protection systems in Asia, in this paper I critically analyse whether the UPOV system is the only effective sui generis protection that is compatible with Article 27(3)(b) of TRIPS. This article provides an overview of the UPOV Convention and Article 27(3)(b), and critically analyses whether, nowadays, the 1991 Act of the upov Convention is the only effective sui generis protection of plant varieties.</span></p>}, number={18}, journal={Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial}, author={Cruz Saldivar, Erwin}, year={2014}, month={nov.}, pages={119–129} }