Good faith in a sovereign debt restructuring sequential game
Good faith in a sovereign debt restructuring sequential game
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
This study explores a legal and economic understanding of breach of good faith. First, it starts with a review of bona fide within the sovereign debt restructuring literature. Then, the study moves into a recent and emblematic case where a breach of good faith was invoked by minority creditors. This case illustrates controversial legal techniques that may be used for enforcing a bond restructuring which in turn rises arguments related to breach of good faith compliance. Next, the research constructs a sequential game for setting the limits of good faith in sovereign debt workouts. The concepts of subgame perfect Nash equilibrium and Pareto optimal are examined in two scenarios: an unsupervised debt restructuring process, and a supervised restructuring process. After this, the article studies how good faith compliance is connected to the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium and Pareto optimality. Finally, the last part briefly discusses how the legal and economic approach to a breach of good faith could be implemented in legal practice.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Referencias (VER)
Abbas, S. A., Pienkowski, A., & Rogoff, K. S. (2019). Sovereign debt : a guide for economists and practitioners (S. A. Abbas, A. Pienkowski, & K. S. Rogoff, Eds.). OUP Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198850823.001.0001
Borensztein, E., & Panizza, U. (2009). “The Costs of Sovereign Default”. IMF Staff Papers, 56(4), pp. 683-741. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfsp.2009.21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/imfsp.2009.21
Bratton, W. lliam W., & Gulati, M. G. (2004). “Sovereign Debt Reform and the Best Interest of Creditors”. Vanderbilt Law Review, 57(1). https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/2275/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.387880
Buchheit, L. C., & Gulati, M. (2021). “The Duty of Creditors to Cooperate in Sovereign Debt Workouts (with Spanish Translation)”. In Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2021-51, Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 2021-26 . https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3950529
Buchheit, L. C., & Gulati, M. (2022). Enforcing Comparable Treatment in Sovereign Debt Workouts. University of Virginia School of Law. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=4229061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4229061
Buchheit, Lee; Chabert, Guillaume; Delong, Chanda; Zettelmeyer, Jeromin (2020). “The restructuring process”. In K. Abbas, S. A.; Pienkowski, Alex; Rogoff (Ed.), Sovereign debt. Oxoford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198850823.003.0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198850823.003.0009
City of Pontiac Policemen’s & Firemen’s Retirement System v. UBS AG (2014). https://casetext.com/case/city-of-pontiac-policemens-firemens-ret-sys-v-ubs-ag
Clark, I., & Lyratzakis, D. (2021). “Towards a more robust sovereign debt restructuring architecture: innovations from Ecuador and Argentina”. Capital Markets Law Journal, 16(1), pp. 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmaa032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmaa032
Complaint. Contrarian Emerging Markets, L.P., GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund, GMO Emerging Country Debt Investment Fund PLC, and GMO Emerging Country Debt (UCITS) Fund, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, against The Repub (2020).
De la Cruz, A., & Lagos, I. (2021). “CACs at Work: What Next?”. SSRN Electronic Journal, ii. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3765825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3765825
De La Cruz, A., & Lagos, I. (2021). CACs at work: What next? Lessons from the Argentine and Ecuadorian 2020 debt restructurings. Capital Markets Law Journal, 16(2), pp. 226-248. https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmab006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmab006
Dennis Edward Myers and Another v Kestrel Acquisitions Ltd and Others (2015).
Goldman, M. (2014). “Good Faith and Transparency in Sovereign Debt Workouts”. In Second Session of the UNCTAD Working Group on a Debt Workout Mechanism. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/gdsddf2014misc3_en.pdf
International Monetary Fund (2021). Ex-post evaluation of exceptional access under the 2018 stand-by arrangement – press release and staff report. 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781616357993.002
International Monetary Fund (2022a). Pres Realease 22/295 IMF Staff Reaches Staff-Level Agree-ment on an Extended Fund Facility Arrangement with Sri Lanka. 2–5. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2022/09/01/pr22295-imf-reaches-staff-level-agreement-on-an-extended-fund-facility-arrangement-with-sri-lanka
International Monetary Fund (2022b). “Reviews of the fund’s sovereign arrears policies and perimeter”. In IMF Policy Papers. http://www.imf.org/external/pp/ppindex.aspx DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400210556.007
International Monetary Fund. (2022c). Zambia: request for an arrangement under the extended credit facility – press release; staff report; staff supplement; staff statement; and statement by the executive director for Zambia. In IMF Staff Country Reports No 22/292. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484328255.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400200380.002
Katz v. Oak Industries, Inc. (1986). https://advance-lexis-com.ezproxy.library.qmul.ac.uk/search/?pdmfid=1519360&crid=07f44bde-bde1-425b-8ec4-24e0beeddf6c&pdsearchterms=Katz+v.+Oak+Indus.%2C+Inc.+-+508+A.2d+873+(Del.+Ch.+1986)&pdstartin=hlct%3A1%3A1&pdtypeofsearch=searchboxclick&pdsearchtype
Kirchner, C., & Ehmke, D. (2012). “Private Ordering in Sovereign Debt Restructuring: Reforming the London Club”. Oxford University Comparative Law Forum. https://ouclf.law.ox.ac.uk/private-ordering-in-sovereign-debt-restructuring-reforming-the-london-club/#fn9sym
Lastra, R., & Buchheit, L. (2014). Sovereign debt management (R. M. Lastra & L. Buchheit, Eds.; 1st ed.). OUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199671106.001.0001
Lastra, R. M., & Bodellini, M. (2018). Soft Law and Sovereign Debt. https://unctad.org/system/ files/non-official-document/SOFT LAW AND SOVEREIGN DEBT.pdf
Li, Y. (2015). “Inter-creditor equity in sovereign debt restructuring: towards the establishment of a multilateral legal framework”. In Leiden University Repository. https://www.universit-eitleiden.nl/en/research/research-output/law/inter-creditor-equity-in-sovereign-debt-restructuring-towards-the-establishment-of-a-multilateral-legal-framework
Principles Consultative Group (2010). Principles for Stable Capital Flows and Fair Debt Restructuring - Report on implementation by the principles consultative group (Issue October). https://www.iif. com/Advocacy_old/Policy-Issues/Principles-for-Stable-Capital-Flows-and-Fair-Debt- Restructuring
Principles Consultative Group (2021). Principles for Stable Capital Flows and Fair Debt Restructuring - 2021 Annual Report Featuring an Interim Report on Updating the Principles with Contribution from the Principles Cosultative Group (Issue October). https://www.iif.com/Publications/ ID/4634/2021-PCG-Report-on-the-Implementation-of-the-Principles
The Institute of International Finance (2005). Principles for stable capital flows and fair debt restructurings in Emerging Markets (Issue March). https://www.iif.com/file/4321/download?token=mBvJtcaR
The Institute of International Finance (2012). Principles for Stable Capital Flows and Fair Debt Re-structuring - with 2012 addendum.
The Republic of Ecuador (2020a). Ecuador´s debt management policy in light of the global health crisis – Press release 25-03-2020.
The Republic of Ecuador (2020b). Ecuador invites all bond holders to join the majority in endorsing the Republic’s proposal. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ecuador-invites-all-bond-holders-to-join-the-majority-in-endorsing-the-republics-proposal-301097263.html
The Republic of Ecuador (2020c). The Republic of Ecuador announces commencement of consent solicitation and invitation to exchange. Press realease July 20, 2020. https://gbsc-usa.com/ecuador/
The Republic of Ecuador (2020d). The Republic of Ecuador responds to certain press reports with respect to its invitation to consent and exchange. Press realease July 24, 2020. https://gbsc-usa.com/ecuador/
The Republic of Ecuador (2022). The Republic of Ecuador responds to legal action filed by Contrarian Capital Management and GMO. July 29, 2020. https://gbsc-usa.com/ecuador/
Thomas, D., & Garcia-Fronti, J. (2007). “Good Faith in Sovereign Debt Restructuring: The Evolution of an Open Norm in ‘Localised’ Contexts?”. WEF Working Paper N° 0017, March. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1026248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1026248
Trebesch, C., Papaioannou, M. G., & Das, U. S. (2012). “Sovereign Debt Restructurings 1950- 2010: Literature Survey, Data, and Stylized Facts”. IMF Working Papers, 12(203), i. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475505535.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475505535.001
United States District Court Southern District of New York. (2020). Contrarian Emerging Markets L.P., GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund, GMO Emerging Country Debt Investment Fund PLC, and GMO Emerging Country Debt (UCITS) Fund, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, V. The Republic of Ecuador.