Reflexiones en torno a la diplomacia científica: estado del debate, experiencia internacional y perspectivas para Colombia
Reflections on science diplomacy: State of the debate, international experiences and perspectives for Colombia
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Si bien la relación entre ciencia y diplomacia es de vieja data, los esfuerzos por conceptualizarla a partir del siglo xxi dieron origen a la diplomacia científica, una noción impulsada de manera entusiasta por emprendedores de política, en particular en la Unión Europea. Sin embargo, la discusión en español sobre este concepto emergente es aun escasa y poco critica, por lo que en este artículo de reflexión se exploran las bases del concepto de diplomacia científica con el propósito de clarificar sus alcances. Repasamos las principales definiciones de la diplomacia científica y mapeamos el avance en la producción de conocimiento sobre la misma. Encontramos que se trata de un campo emergente, con arraigo disciplinar en la tradición de las relaciones internacionales y de base empírica multisectorial, preocupada esencialmente por retos ambientales desde el Norte Global. Asimismo, examinamos algunas experiencias internacionales que ilustran las posibles perspectivas y condiciones de viabilidad de la diplomacia científica en Colombia. El articulo concluye con algunas reflexiones críticas sobre el concepto.
Palabras clave:
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Referencias (VER)
Aukes, E.; Wilsdon, J.; Ordóñez-Matamoros, G. and Kuhlmann, S. (2021). Global resilience through knowledge-based cooperation: A New Protocol for Science Diplomacy. S4D4C Project. Disponible en https://www.s4d4c.eu/the-new-sciencediplomacy-protocol/.
Aukes, E.; Ebrahimi, S.H.; Ordóñez-Matamoros, G. and Kuhlmann, S. (2020). Towards effective science diplomacy practice. s4d4c Policy Brief, No. 2. s4d4c (Vienna). Disponible en https://www.s4d4c.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/s4d4c-Towards-effective-science-diplomacypractice.pdf.
Bonilla Aranzales, J. K. (2018). Science Diplomacy: New day or false dawn. Análisis Político, 31(94), 209-212. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/anpol.v31n94.78311
Carosso, G. A.; Ferreira, L. M. R. and Mostajo-Radji, M. A. (2019) Developing Brains, Developing Nations: Can Scientists Be Effective Non-state Diplomats? Front. Educ. 4:95. Doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00095
Copeland, D. (2016). Science Diplomacy. En C. Constantinou, P. Kerr & P. Sharp (Edits.), Sage Handbook of Diplomacy (pp. 628–641). London: Sage Publications.
Elorza, A.; Melchor, L.; Orts-Gil, G.; Gracia, C.; Lacunza, I.; Izquierdo, B. and Fernández-Vera, J. I. (2017). Spanish Science Diplomacy: A Global and Collaborative Bottom-Up Approach, Science & Diplomacy, vol. 6, No. 1.
Elorza, A.; Melchor, L. and Lacunza, I. (2020). Who Are the Science Diplomacy Stakeholders? In s4d4c European Science Diplomacy Online Course, Module 3, Vienna: s4d4c. Disponible en https://www.s4d4c.eu/european-science- diplomacyonline-course/
Fedoroff, N. (2009). Science Diplomacy in the 21st Century. Cell, 136 (1), 9-11.
Flink, T. (2020). The sensationalist discourse of science diplomacy: A critical reflection. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15 (3), pp. 359-370
Flink, T. (03/09/2020). Blog Post | Actions and Lofty Promises of Science Diplomacy. Obtenido de https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/hjd/news/2020/blog-post---actions-and-lofty-promises-of-science-diplomacy
Flink, T. & Schreiterer, U. (2009). Aufgabenkritische Analyse deutscher Außenwissenschaftspolitik (awp) in sechs ausgewählten Zielländern. wzb: Abschlussbericht.
Forman, J. E. et al. (2018). Innovative technologies for chemical security. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 90 (10), pp. 1647-1670.
French, S. et al. (2018). Perspectives on Strengthening Cancer Research and Control in Latin America Through Partnerships and Diplomacy: Experience of the National Cancer Institute’s Center for Global Health. Journal of Global Oncology, vol. 4. Doi: 10.1200/JGO.17.00149
Rodríguez García-Huidobro, G. (2017). Chile: Global Astronomical Platform and Opportunity for Diplomacy, Science & Diplomacy, vol. 6, No. 2.
Giovani, B.; Blümel, S.; Lopian, R. et al. (2020). Science diplomacy for plant health. Nat. Plants 6, 902–905
Gluckman, P.D.; Turekian, V.; Grimes, R.W. and Kishi, T. (2017). Science Diplomacy: A Pragmatic Perspective from the Inside, Science & Diplomacy, vol. 6, No. 4.
Gore, M. L.; Nichols, E. S. and Lips, K. R. (2020). Preparing scientists for science diplomacy requires new science policy bridges. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15 (3), pp. 424-434.
Haas, P. M. (1992). Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46 (1), 1–35.
Harris, P. G. (Edited) (2009). Climate change in environmental foreign policy: Science, diplomacy, and politics. Climate Change and Foreign Policy: Case Studies from East to West, pp. 1-17. Routledge, isbn: 0203881400; 978-020388140-8. Doi:
4324/9780203881408
Isaza, J. P. (2020). Breve repaso del contexto institucional de la diplomacia científica, tecnológica y de innovación en Colombia 2004-2006. Innovación & Ciencia, xxvii (2). Obtenido de https://innovacionyciencia.com/articulos_cientificos/breve-repaso-del-contexto-institucional-de-la-diplomacia-cientifica-tecnologica-y-de-innovacionen-colombia-2004-2006
Juma, C. (2002). Biotechnology and international relations: Forging new strategic partnerships. International Journal of Biotechnology, 4 (2-3), pp. 115-128.
Kaltofen, C. and Akuto, M. (2018). Science Diplomacy: Introduction to a Boundary Problem, Global Policy 9, pp. 8-14
Kera, D. (2014). Innovation regimes based on collaborative and global tinkering: Synthetic biology and nanotechnology in the hackerspaces. Technology in Society, vol. 37, pp. 28-37.
Kuhlmann, S.; Edler, J.; Ordóñez-Matamoros, G.; Randles, S.; Walhout, B.; Gough, C. & Lindner, R. (2016). Responsibility Navigator. Governance framework for Responsible Research and Innovation. Karlsruhe: Res-AGorA Project.
Lacunza, I. (2020). Seminario Internacional, Nuevas Diplomacias 2020. Módulo de Diplomacia Científica. Sesión 3. Bogotá: Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales. Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Lloyd S., D. and Patman, R. G. (Eds.) (2015). Science Diplomacy: New Day or False Dawn, New Zealand: University of Otago.
López, A. & Schunz, S. (19/10/2017). Understanding European Union science diplomacy. Obtenido de LSE Brexit http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/85573/1/brexit-2017-10-19-understanding-europeanunion-science.pdf
Malacalza, B. (2017). A look inside an emerging nuclear supplier. Advocacy coalitions and change in Argentine foreign nuclear policy. Third World Quarterly, 38 (10). Pages 2295-2311
Mauduit, J.-C. and Gual Soler, M. (2020). Building a Science Diplomacy Curriculum. Frontiers in Education, 5:138. Doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.00138.
McKinney, L. (2017). Continue U.S.-Cuban science diplomacy. Science, vol. 358, Issue 6370, pp. 1549. Doi: 10.1126/science.aar7724
Megdal, S.B.; Varady, R.G. and Eden, S. (2012). Shared borders, shared waters: Israeli-palestinian and Colorado river basin water challenges. CRC Press.
Melchor, L. (2020). What is a science diplomat. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15 (3), pp. 409-423
Melchor, L.; Elorza, A. and Lacunza, I. (2020). Calling for a Systemic Change: Towards a European Union Science Diplomacy for Addressing Global Challenges, vol. 1.0. s4d4c Policy Report, Madrid: s4d4c.
Meyer, J-B. and Brown, M. (1999). Scientific Diasporas: A New Approach to the Brain Drain, Management of Social Transformations (most) program, Discussion Paper Series 41, prepared for the unesco- icsu World Conference on Science, June
–July 1, 1999, Budapest, Hungary, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001163/116330eo.pdf.
MinCiencias. (s.f.). Internacionalización. Obtenido de Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación https://minciencias.gov.co/portafolio/internacionalizacion
Mojtahedi, Z. and Ghaderi, A. (2012). Proteomics studies in oncology towards personalized medicine in public health: Opportunities and challenges for omics research in Iran. Current Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, vol. 10, Issue 4, pp. 265-270.
Ordóñez-Matamoros, G. y Centeno, J. P. (2019). Editorial- Memorias del Congreso Internacional sobre Gobernanza de la Ciencia y la Innovación. Hacia el desarrollo inclusivo. Revista Innovación y Ciencia, 26 (2). Asociación Colombiana para el Avance de la Ciencia - Acac. issn: 2590-8537. Disponible en https://innovacionyciencia.com/revista/101
Pantovic, B. y Michelini, G. (2018). Ciencia y cultura de la memoria en la diplomacia serbia. Revista Cidob d’Afers Internacionals, No. 120, pp. 241-258. Doi: doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2018.120.3.241
Ramírez-Cabrales, F. and Forero, S.I.R. (2020). Science Diplomacy: Strategic Initiative to Create a Buffer Zone in the Caribbean Colombian Marine Protected Area Seaflower. In: Rocha Á. and Pereira R. (eds.), Developments and Advances in Defense and Security. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 152. Springer, Singapore.
Riordan, S. (2016). Diaspora Diplomacy: A Double Edged Sword, BideDao, June 6, Disponible en http://www.shaunriordan.com/?p=279.
Ritch iii, J. B. (1999). Nuclear green: Perspectives on science, diplomacy and atoms for peace. Iaea Bulletin, 41 (2), p. 2.
Ruffini, P. (2020). Collaboration and Competition: The Twofold Logic of Science Diplomacy, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15 (3), 371-382. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-bja10028.
Rungius, C. (2018). State-of-the-art report: summarizing literature on science diplomacy cases and concepts. S4D4C Project. Obtenido de https://www.s4d4c.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/s4d4c_State-of-the-Art_Report_dzhw.pdf
Rungius, C. & Flink, T. (2020). Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 7 (102), 1-10. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00585-w
s4d4c. (2019). The Madrid Declaration on Science Diplomacy. Madrid: s4d4c. Obtenido de https://www.s4d4c.eu/s4d4c-1st-global-meeting/the-madriddeclaration-on-science-diplomacy/
Sabatier, P. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21 (2), 129-168.
Sarkadi, B. and Schatten, G. (2012). Stem Cell Course in the Middle East: Science Diplomacy and International Collaborations During the Arab Spring. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, 8 (1), pp. 87-90. Doi: 10.1007/s12015-011-9277-z
Saxenian, A. (2006). The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage In a Global Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. (2018). Science Diplomacy - Postnote Number 568. London: Westminster.
The Royal Society. (2010). New frontiers in science diplomacy. Navigating the changing balance of power. London. Obtenido de https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2010/4294969468.pdf
Timperley, C. M. et al. (2018). Advice from the scientific advisory board of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons on isotopically labelled chemicals and stereoisomers in relation to the Chemical Weapons Convention. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 90 (10), pp. 1647-1670.
Turekian, V.; Macindoe, S.; Copeland, D.; Davis, L.; Patman, R. & Pozza, M. (2015). The Emergence of Science Diplomacy. En L. Davis, & R. Patman (Edits.), Science Diplomacy. New Day or False Dawn? Ciudad: World Scientific Publishing Company.
Turekian, V. (2018). The Evolution of Science Diplomacy. Global Policy, 9 (3). Doi: 10.1111/1758- 5899.12622.
Vikhlyaev, A. A. (2005). Science on the tap, not on the top. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1 (2), pp. 145-161. Doi: 10.1504/ijtg.2005.007048.
Pickett, W.E., Leggett, A.J. & Chu, P.C.W. (2014). Science diplomacy in Iran. Nature Physics, 10, pp. 465–467.
Wilder, M. et al. (2020). Hydrodiplomacy and adaptive governance at the U.S.-Mexico border: 75 years of tradition and innovation in transboundary water management. Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 112, pp. 189-202. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.013