The Role of search engines in Colombia after the Muebles Caqueta vs. Google Inc decision

Main Article Content

Autores

Sarah Osma Peralta

Resumen

Teniendo en cuenta la importancia de la protección de datos personales, esta investigación se centrará en la identificación de los criterios utilizados por los tribunales colombianos respecto a los derechos de acceso, modificación y supresión de datos personales en el contexto de la información disponible al público a través de los motores de búsqueda. Este marco de referencia expondrá los diferentes casos puestos en conocimiento de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia y de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia, en tanto que intenta resaltar cuál fue el criterio utilizado por estas para determinar que los motores de búsqueda son simples intermediarios entre los creadores de contenido y los titulares de datos personales. Finalmente, este estudio intenta contribuir no solo a la literatura legal de protección de datos en Colombia, sino también a mejorar las posibilidades de implementar efectivamente los derechos de los usuarios de los motores de búsqueda en línea en Colombia.

Palabras clave:

Article Details

Referencias

Alsenoy, B. V. & Koekkoek, M. http://ghum.kuleuven.be/. 2015. Retrieved from http://ghum.kuleuven.be/: http://ghum.kuleuven.be/ggs/publications/working_papers/new_series/wp151-160/wp152- alsenoy-koekkoek.pdf

Ambrose, M. L. Speaking of forgetting: Analysis of possible non-eu responses to the right to be forgotten and speech exception. Communication, Culture & Technology, Georgetown University, 3520 Prospect St. NW, Suite 311, Washington, dc 20057, USA (2014).

Andrade, N. N. Oblivion: The right to be different from oneself, Reproposing the Right to be Forgotten. In Ghezzi A., Pereira Â.G., Vesnic´-Alujevic´ L. (eds.), The Ethics of Memory in a Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. (2008). Opinion 1/2008 on data protection issues related to search engines. Brussels. Retrieved September 23, 2018 http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2008/wp148_en.pdf

Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, guidelines on the implementation of the Google Spain case. (2014, November 26). Retrieved September 23, 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinion- recommendation/files/2014/wp225_en.pdf

Bernal, P. The eu, the us and Right to be forgotten. Reloading Data Protection: Multidisciplinary Insights and Contemporary Challenges. ed. / Serge Gutwirth; Ronald Leenes; Paul De Hert. Springer, 2014.

Brin, S., & Page, L. The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine. (1997) Retrieved on October 5 2018, from http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/361/1/1998-8.pdf

Case Bodil Lindqvist C-101/01. (2003, November 6). Retrieved on October 5 of 2018 from http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=48382&doclang=

Case Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González C-131/12, C. 2014. Retrieved on October 10 of 2018, from Case C-131/12 [2014] Retrieved on October 10, 2018: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document_print.jsf?doclang=EN&text&pageIndex=0&part=1&mode=DOC&docid=152065&occ=first&dir&cid=437838

Commission National de L’informatique et des libertes. 2009. www.cnil.fr. Retrieved September 6, 2018, from https://www.cnil.fr/sites/default/files/typo/document/CNIL-30erapport_2009.pdf

Commission to the European Parliament. (2010, November 4). http://ec.europa.eu/justice/news/consulting_public/0006/contributions/organisations/beuc_en.pdf. Retrieved September 2, 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/news/consultingpublic/0006/contributions/organisations/beu c_en.pdf [hereinafter Comprehensive Approach on Personal Data Protection].

Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data. Strasbourg, 1981.

ECHR. (2010, June). http://www.echr.coe.int/. Retrieved on September 12, 2018, from http://www.echr.coe.int: http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_eng.pdf

European Parliament and Council. (1995, Octubre 24). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/.Retrieved on September 20 of 2018 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/txt/?uri=celex%3A32016R0679

Evans, M. Analysing Google rankings through search engine optimization data. Internet Research 17, (2007): 21-37. Available at https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240710730470

Gasser, U. Regulating Search Engines: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead. Yale journal of Law and technology 8, (2006): 203. Article 7.

EU GDPR, Regulation (eu) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/ec (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with eea relevance). Retrieved on September 26 of 2018 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/txt/?qid=1532348683434&uri=celex:02016R0679-20160504

Google www.Google.com. Retrieved September 9, 2018, from https://www.google.com/about/company/

Google Annual Meeting of Stockholders. (2014, October 16). Google Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Retrieved on October 12, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcFTklq2-lI

Google’s response to Art 29 wp requests. (2014, july 31). www.google.fr. Retrieved from www.google.fr. Retrieved on October 12 of 2018 https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8syaai6SSfiT0EwRUFyOENqR3M/edit

Graux, Ausloos and Valcke. 2012. The right to be forgotten in the internet era, working paper. Retrieved on October 12, 2018, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2174896

Handbook on European data protection law . 2014. http://www.echr.coe.int/.Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Handbook_data_protection_02ENG.pdf

Italian Supreme Court Case no. 3679 of 1998. Retrieved from s.sica and v.zenozencovich, Legislazione, giurisprudenza e dottrina nel diritto dell’Internet , in Il diritto dell’informazione e dell’informatica, 2010, p. 387

Karma Snack. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from Retrieved from http://karmasnack.com/about/search-engine-market-share/

Koops, B. J. Forgetting Footprints, Shunning Shadows: A Critical Analysis of the’Right to Be Forgotten’in Big Data Practice. 2011. scripted, p. 234.

Korenhof, P. Stage ahoy! Deconstruction of the “Drunken Pirate” Case in the Light of impression management. Reloading Data Protection Multidisciplinary Insights and Contemporary Challenges. Springer. 2014.

Mayer-Schönberger, V. Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton: Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.

Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2012, June 2). Oxford Internet Institute. Retrieved from www.youtube.com: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0b-RT42uDYI

Moerel, E.M.L. The long arm of eu data protection law: Does the Data Protection Directive apply to processing of personal data of eu citizens by websites worldwide? International Data Privacy Law, (2011): 28-46.

Patrick Van Eecke, google advisory council. (2015). Retrieved on October 5 of 2018 from https://www.google.com/advisorycouncil/

Pino, G. The Right to Personal Identity in Italian Private Law: Constitutional Interpretation and Judge-Made Rights. Conference; edited by Mark Van Hoecke and Francois Ost, European private law in context; The harmonization

Posner, E. Slate.com. Retrieved Retrieved on October 5 of 2018 from Slate.com: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/view_from_chicago/2014/05/the_european_right_to_be_forgotten_is_just_what_the_internet_needs.html

Reding V. The European data protection framework for the twenty-first century. International Data Privacy Law 2, (2012): 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ips015

Sartor, G. The Right to be forgotten in the Draft Data Protection Regulation. International Data Privacy Law. 2014. Retrieved on September 20 of 2018, from https://brusselsprivacyhub.eu/Resources/Sartor_Presentation_Right_To_Be_Forgotten_Bruxelles_28102014.pdf

Simon Castellano, P. El reconocimiento del derecho al olvido digital en España y en la ue. Madrid: Efectos tras la sentencia del tjue de mayo de 2014. Barcelona: Wolters Kluwer, 2015.

Zittrain, J. (2014, may 14). http://www.nytimes.com/. Retrieved On October 12 of 2018 from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/15/opinion/dontforce-google-to-forget.html 95/46/ec, d. (1995, October 24). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/. Retrieved from http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=celex:31995L0046:en:html

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.