Implementation of patent prosecution highway (pph) in colombia. Legal, technical analysis, and initial effects

Implementación del procedimiento acelerado de patentes (PPH) en Colombia. Análisis jurídico, técnico y efectos iniciales

Main Article Content

Óscar Lizarazo-Cortés
Natalia Lamprea Bermúdez

Abstract

Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) are agreements between industrial property offices that allow an patent application, that has been granted in a first presentation office (OPP, for its initials in Spanish), to be able to follow an accelerated process in the second presentation office (OSP, for its initials in Spanish), achieving with this the recognition of the examination done by the OPP. Colombia signed its first PPH in 2012 and until September 2014 has signed a total of three agreements, with the United States Patents and Trademark Office (USPTO), Spain (OEPM) and Japan (JPO). The main goal of this paper is to contribute academically with the understanding of this mechanism, its advantages and disadvantages, based on the legal and technical analysis, and case studies. The analysis shows that the PPH reduces significantly the granting times of patents. However, in practice the advantage – at this time - is mainly for foreign applicants, there is no evidence of duplicity in the patentability examination due to the difference in the standards of each country, instead, it was observed the introduction of different criteria and patentability alignments from those expressed in the current normativity applicable in Colombia.

Keywords:

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References (SEE)

Bassewitz, Katharina von, Trade Dress und Functionality - Ein Vergleich des marken- und wettbewerbsrechtlichen Schutzes von Produktformen in den USA und Deutschland - Zugleich eine Anmerkung zum Urteil Antioch Co. v. Western Trimming Corp., GRUR Int 2004, 390-395.

Bornkamm, Joachim, Markenrecht und wettbewerbsrechtlicher Kennzeichenschutz zur Vorrangthese der Rechtsprechung, GRUR 2005, 97-102.

Cooley, Amanda Harmon, Trade dress protection of business décor: What is this tertium quid?, Southern Law Journal,vol. 18 (2008), [http://www.southernlawjournal.com/2008/02_.pdf], visited 20th September 2014.

Dinwoodie, Graeme B., Trade dress and design law, New York, Austin, 2010. Dinwoodie, Graeme B., Trademarks and unfair competition, Law and policy, Third ed., 2010. Dinwoodie, Graeme B. & Janis, Mark D., Trade dress and design law, New York, Austin, 2010.

Eck (ed.), Wettbewerbsrecht, 2010 (cited: Eck).

Fezer, Karl-Heinz (ed.), Markenrecht, 2009 (cited: Fezer).

FLJ-29-1-sum-2009_sandberg, [http://www.swlaw.com/assets/pdf/publications/2009/07/01/FLJ-29-1-sum-2009_Sandberg.pdf] (visited 18th September 2014).

Gausling, T., GERMAN Federal Supreme Court expands design protection: ‘Birthday Train’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 9 (2014), 549-550.

Goldmann, michael, Eintragung der Darstellung einer Laden-Ausstattung als Marke, grur-Prax 2014 (21.09.2014), 349, [https://beck-online.beck.de/Default.aspx?vpath=bibdata/zeits/grurprax/2014/cont/grurprax.2014.349.1.htm&pos=4&hlwords=apple%c3%90+apple+#xhlhit] (visited 21st September 2014).

Henning-Bodewig, Frauke, International handbook on unfair competition, Munich, C.H. Beck.

Hilliard, David Craig; Welch, Joseph n. & Widmaier, Uli, Trademarks and unfair competition, 9th ed., New Providence, NJ, 2012.

Jacobs, Hara K.; Lee, Melissa L., Mitchell, Glenn & Wadyka, Steven J., U.S. trade dress law, A Primer for the new millenium, New York, NY, 2002.

Köhler, Jürgen, Das Verhältnis des Wettbewerbsrechts zum Recht des geistigen Eigentums - Zur Notwendigkeit einer Neubestimmung auf Grund der Richtlinie über unlautere Geschäftspraktiken, grur 2007, 548-554.

Matheson, Julia Anne & Cooke, Whitney devin, Is Your Store Design Unique? Trademark It, 2013 (visited 13th September 2014).

McCarthy, J. Thomas, McCarthy on trademarks and unfair competition, vol. 1, Darfield, IL 2007.

McConnell, Akila Sankar, Making Wal-Mart Pretty: Trademarks and Aesthetic Restrictions on Big-Box Retailers, Duke Law Journal 53 (2004), 1537-1567, in: [http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1223&context=dlj] (visited 20th September 2014).

Navigating Fashion law, Leading lawyers on exploring the trends, cases, and strategies of fashion law, Boston, Mass., 2012.

Ohly, Ansgar & Sosnitza, Olaf (ed.), UWG, 6. Ed. 2014 (cited: Ohly & Sosnitza).

Pagenberg, Jochen, Trade Dress and the Three-Dimensional Mark - The Neglected Children of Trademark Law?, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2004, 832-843.

Sandberg, Scott C., Trade Dress: what does it mean?, Franchise Law Journal, 2009, [http://www.swlaw.com/assets/pdf/publications/2009/07/01/FLJ-29-1-sum-2009_sandberg.pdf] (visited 10th September 2014).

Sander, Charlotte, Der Schutz von Geschäftsraumgestaltungen durch das Immaterialgüter- und Wettbewerbsrecht im deutschen und amerikanischen Recht, GRUR Int. 2014, 215-228.

Suthersanen, Uma, Design law, European Union and United States of America, 2nd ed., London, 2010.

Citado por