((D)(E-)) Valuation of the EU’s “Moral Power” in the European Neighbourhood (Policy) (ENP)
((D)(E-)) Valuation of the EU’s “Moral Power” in the European Neighbourhood (Policy) (ENP)
Barra lateral del artículo
PDF (English)
FLIP
HTML (English)
XML (English)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Inspirado en la Nueva Guerra Fría entre Rusia y Occidente desde 2014, este artículo se basa en la teoría moral que gira en torno al marco conceptual del “poder moral” que procede teóricamente del poder “civil”/“normativo/”ética” europeo. Este se aplica a la (Política) Europea de Vecindad (ENP) como un caso de prueba principal compuesto de estudios de casos atomiza- dos en un terreno geográfico caracterizado por la agitación política, de seguridad y económica.
Ontológicamente, el artículo une el neorrealismo, el constructivismo y la teoría crítica para explicar los últimos acontecimientos en la vecindad política de la UE. Epistemológicamente, se basa en las trayectorias exterior/interior, ascendente, entrante/saliente para captar la dinámica local, la interacción regional y el contexto global. Metodológicamente, lleva a cabo un discurso cualitativo y un análisis de contenido cuantitativo que trasciende los giros “pragmáticos” y “narrativos” hacia el interpretativismo.
Este artículo a) demuestra la transición teórica del “poder normativo de Europa” (NPE) al “poder moral” que deconstruye las normas centrales y secundarias de la NPE y b) anatomiza la ENP a través de los siete “parámetros” de la “moralidad”, a saber, consecuencialismo, coherencia, consistencia, equilibrio entre valores e intereses, estabilidad normativa, inclusión y legitimidad externa, y el tipo relevante de “poder”, es decir, “potencial”, “real” y “actualizado”. De este modo, “construye” una pirámide que compartimenta las normas de la UE de acuerdo con una supuesta moralidad objetiva, una ética relativa y una normatividad subjetiva. En última instancia, más allá de la realpolitik, el artículo muestra el agotamiento de la ENP, que induce la (de) valuación del “poder moral” de la UE a través de “digresiones normativas”: corrosión, derogación, desviación, perversión, erosión, conversión, subversión en conjunto con “distorsiones morales”: moralmente utilitarias, inmorales, antimorales, amorales, inmorales, no morales y moralistas.
Palabras clave:
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Referencias (VER)
Aggestam, L. (2008). Introduction: Ethical power Europe? International Affairs, 84(1), 1-11.
Badalyan, T. & Vasilyan, S. (2020). The perceived rationale, variegated institutional take and impact of the EU’s human rights policy in Armenia and Georgia. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 28(4), 514-529.
Baer, S. (2009). Dignity, liberty, equality: A fundamental rights triangle of constitutionalism. The University of Toronto Law Journal, 59(4), 417-468.
Baglione, L. A. (2008). Emphasizing principles for a moral foreign policy. American Behavioural Scientist, 51(9), 1303-1321.
Bell, D. (Ed.) (2010). Ethics and world politics. Oxford University Press.
Besch, S. (2019). The European Commission in EU defence industrial policy. Carnegie Europe.
Besch, S. & Oppenheim, B. (2019). Up the arms: Warring over Europe’s arms export regime, Centre for European Reform.
Boghossian, P. (2015). Rules, norms and principles: A conceptual framework. In M. Araszkiewicz, P. Banaś, T. Gizbert-Studnicki, K. Płeszka (Eds.). Problems of normativity, rules and rule-following (pp. 3-11). Springer.
Brzezinski, Z. (1997). The grand chessboard: American primacy and its geostrategic imperatives. Basic Books.
Bull, H. (1971). Order vs. justice in international society. Political Studies, 19(3), 269-283.
Buzan, B. (2001). The English school: An underexploited resource in IR. Review of International Studies, 27(3), 471-488.
Chomsky, N. (1999). Profit over people: Neoliberalism and global order. Seven Stories Press.
Congleton, R. (2020). Ethics and good governance. Public Choice, 184(3), 379-398.
Crescenzi, M. (2018). Of friends and foes: Reputation and learning in international politics. Oxford University Press.
Damro, C. (2012). Market power Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(5), 682-699.
Delanty, G. (2014). Not all is lost in translation: World varieties of cosmopolitanism. Cultural Sociology, 8(4), 374-391.
Diez, T. (2013). Normative power as hegemony. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(2), 194-210.
Douglas, W. A. (2019). Forced moral choices in foreign policy. SAIS Review, 39(1), 49-57.
Drake, D. (1929). The new morality. The Macmillan Company.
European Commission (2020). Nagorno Karabakh: Statement by the High Representative/Vice- President Josep Borrell. https://ec.europa.eu/ neighbourhood-enlargement/news/nagorno-karabakh-statement-high-representativevice-president-josep-borrell-2020-09-27_en
European Commission (2020). Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Eastern Partnership policy beyond 2020. European Commission, Brussels.
European Commission (2021). Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Renewed partnership with the Southern Neighbourhood. European Commission, Brussels.
European Commission (n.d.a). State of the Union addresses by Jean-Claude Juncker. https://state-of-the-union.ec.europa.eu/state-union-addresses-jean-claude-juncker_en
European Commission (n.d.b). State of the Union addresses. https://state-of-the-union.ec.europa. eu/index_en
European External Action Service (2020). Nagorno Karabakh: Statement by the High Representative/Vice-President Josep Borrell on the cessation of hostilities. https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/88476/nagorno-karabakh-statement-high-representativevice-president-josep-borrell-cessation_en
Forsberg, T. (2011). Normative power Europe, once again: A conceptual analysis of an ideal type. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(6), 1183-1204.
FreedomHouse (n.d.). Countries and territories. https://freedomhouse.org/countries/nations-transit/scores
Frega, R. (2017). The normativity of democracy. European Journal of Political Theory, 18(3), 371-392.
Hage, J. (2015). Separating rules from normativity. In M. Araszkiewicz, P. Banaś, T. Gizbert- Studnicki & K. Płeszka (Eds.), Problems of normativity, rules and rule-following (pp. 13- 30). Springer.
Hart, H.L.A. (1967). Social solidarity and the enforcement of morality. University of Chicago Law Review, 35(1), 1-27.
Heinelt, H. & Münch, S. (Eds). (2018). Handbook of European policies: Interpretive approaches to the EU. Edward Elgar.
Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the global order: From the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Stanford University Press.
Inoguchi, T. (2014). A call for a new Japanese foreign policy: The dilemmas of a stakeholder state. International Affairs, 90(4), 943-958.
Kaspar, D. (2019). The natures of moral acts. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 5(1), 117-135.
Kavalski, E. (2013). The struggle for recognition of normative powers: Normative power Europe and normative power China in context. Cooperation and Conflict 48(2), 247-267.
Kennan, G. F. (1985). Morality and foreign policy. Foreign Affairs, 64(2), 205-218.
Konert, A. & Balcerzak, T. (2021). Military autonomous drones (UAVS)–from fantasy to reality. Legal and ethical implications. Transportation Research Procedia, 59, 292-299.
Kratochwil, F. (2018). Praxis: On acting and knowing. Cambridge University Press.
Landemore, H. (2017). Deliberative democracy as open, not (just) representative democracy. Daedalus, 146(3), 51-63.
Langhelle, O. (1999). Sustainable development: Exploring the ethics of our common future. International Political Science Review, 20(2), 129-149.
Leys, W. A. R. (1962). Ethics and the rule of law. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 343(1), 32-38.
Magroori, R. & Ramberg, B. (Eds.) (1982). Globalism versus realism: international relations’ third debate. Routledge.
Manners, I. (2002). Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235-58.
Mearsheimer, J. (2009). Reckless states and realism. International Relations, 23(2), 241-256.
Morgenthau, H. J. (1954). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. Alfred A. Knopf.
Parker, O. & Rosamond, B. (2013). ‘Normative power Europe’ meets economic liberalism: Complicating cosmopolitanism inside/outside the EU. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(2), 229-246.
Powell, R. (1991). Absolute and relative gains in international relations theory. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1303-1320.
Price, R. & Reus-Smit, C. (1998). Dangerous liaisons? Critical international theory and constructivism. European Journal of International Relations, 4(3), 259-294.
Raz, J. (1992). The relevance of coherence. Boston University Law Review, 72(2), 273-321.
Rosamond, B. (2013). Three ways of speaking Europe to the world: Markets, peace, cosmopolitan duty and the EU’s normative power. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(1), 133-148.
Rothbard, M. N. (2015). The ethics of liberty. New York University Press.
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Smith, S. (2003). International relations and international relations: The links between theory and practice in world politics. Journal of International Relations and Development, 6(3), 233-239.
Smith, R. (2021). A new paradigm: Mutually assured security. War on the Rocks. https://warontherocks.com/2021/07/a-new-paradigm-mutually-assured-security/
Trachtman, J. P. (2013). The future of international law: Global government. Cambridge University Press.
Vasilyan, S. (2006). The policy of regional cooperation in the South Caucasus. Working Paper 24. Argentinean Centre of International Studies.
Vasilyan, S. (2007). The European Union (EU) as a “civilian” and “normative” power: Connotational meanings from outside. Paper presented at the European Union Studies Association (EUSA) Tenth Biennial International Conference, Montreal.
Vasilyan, S (2013). ‘Moral Power’ as objectification of ‘civilian’/nNormative’ EUlogy: The EU as a conflict-dealer in the South Caucasus. Journal of International Relations and Development, 17(13), 397-424.
Vasilyan, S. (2018). Novel solutions to resolve the conflicts in the EU’s Eastern neighbourhood. College of Europe Policy Brief (CEPOB), Series 2.18. https://www.coleurope.eu/news/newissue-college-europe-policy-brief-series-cepob-25
Vasilyan, S. (2019). Japan and the EU as ‘moral powers’ in the South Caucasus. Paper, Conference “Multifaceted Values in Multilevel Contexts”, Waseda University, Tokyo.
Vasilyan, S. (2020). ‘Moral power’ of the European Union in the South Caucasus. Palgrave Macmillan.
Vasilyan, S. (2021). ‘SOTEU 2021: unjustified lethargy of the EU’s ‘Moral Power’’, Op-Ed. Institute for European Studies, Université Libre de Bruxelles. https://www.iee-ulb.eu/en/ blog/academic/soteu21-a-diluted-vision-for-the-east-and-the-south/
Wagner, W. (2017). Liberal power Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(6), 1398-1414.
Waltz, K. (2000). Structural realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5-41.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what States Make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425.
Williams, W. E. (2003). Discrimination: The law vs. morality. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 13(1), 111-136.
Citado por
