Construcción y deconstrucción de la subjetividad jurídica. Una reflexión sobre cuerpos y tecnologías desde Shulamith Firestone hasta Donna Haraway
Doing and Undoing Legal Subjectivity. A Reflection on Bodies and Technology from Shulamith Firestone to Donna Haraway
Barra lateral del artículo
PDF
FLIP
HTML
XML
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este artículo tiene como objetivo presentar una reflexión crítica sobre la subjetividad jurídica, centrándose en el impacto de la tecnología en los problemas jurídicos del feminismo. En particular, después de una descripción general acerca de las mujeres en la tecnología y de mujeres y tecnología, se examinan las perspectivas de Shulamith Firestone y Donna Haraway. La primera lleva a la “construcción” del sujeto jurídico, sobre la base de un acto voluntario y racional (individual); la segunda, en cambio, conduce a la “deconstrucción” de la subjetividad jurídica en sí misma. Algunas consideraciones finales enfatizan las implicaciones que las reflexiones críticas sobre cuerpos, tecnologías y subjetividad tienen sobre la teoría del derecho y su finalidad.
Palabras clave:
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Referencias (VER)
Åsberg, C. y Lykke, N. Feminist Technoscience Studies. En European Journal of Women’s Studies, 4, 2010, 299-305.
Baccolini, R. Corpo, diritti riproduttivi e rapporti di genere nelle distopie delle donne del terzo millennio. En Cosmopolis. 2018. Disponible en: https://www.cosmopolisonline.it/articolo.php?numero=xv122018&id=2
Balsamo, A. Technologies of the Gendered Body: Reading Cyborg Women. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998.
Bauchspies, W. K. y Pig de la Bellacasa, M. Feminist Science and Technology Studies: A Patchwork of Moving Subjectivities. An Interview with Geoffrey Bowker, Sandra Harding, Anne Marie Mol, Susan Leigh Star and Banu Subramaniam. En Subjectivity. 28, 2019, 334-344.
Benhabib, S. y Cornwell, D. (eds.). Feminism as a Critique. On the Politics of Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
Bernardini, M. G. Introduzione. Le teorie critiche del diritto: soggettività in mutamento. En Bernardini, M. G. y Giolo, O. (eds.), Le teorie critiche del diritto. Pisa: Pacini, 2017.
Bourdieu, P. La domination masculine. París: Seuil, 1998.
Bray, F. Gender and Technology. En Annual Review of Anthropology. 2007, 37-52.
Brodribb, S. Nothing Matters. A Feminist Critique of Postmodernism. Melbourne: Pinifex, 1992.
Butler, J. Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Nueva York: Routledge, 1990.
Butler, J. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. Nueva York: Routledge, 1993.
Butler, J. Undoing Gender. Nueva York: Routledge, 2004.
Clarke, A. y Haraway, D. (eds.), Make Kin Not Population. Reconceiving Generations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.
Cockburn, C. The Circuit of Technology: Gender, Identity and Power. En Silverstone, R. y Hirsch, E. (eds.), Consuming Technology: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. Londres: Routledge, 1992, 32-47.
Conceição da Costa, M. y Buzzo Feltrin, R. Challenges of Intersectionality in Gender, Science and Technology. En Cadernos Pagu. 47, 2016. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0104-83332016000200701&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
Cossutta, C., Greco, V. y Mainardi, A. Smagliature digitali. Corpi, generi e tecnologie. Milán: Agenzia X, 2018.
Cozza, M. Computing e gendering. La costruzione del genere nel settore informatico. En Quaderni donna & ricerca. 7-8, 2007, 1-69.
Dostoevskij, F. Notes from the Underground (1864). Nueva York: Dover, 1992.
Faulkner, W. The Technology Question in Feminism: A View from Feminist Technology Studies. En Women’s Studies International Forum. 1, 2001, 79-95.
Federici, S. Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle. Oakland (CA): PM Press, 2012.
Fineman, M. A. (ed.). Transcending the Boundaries of Law. Generations of Feminism and Legal Theory. Londres y Nueva York: Routledge, 2010.
Firestone, S. The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. Nueva York: William Morrow and Co., 1970.
Foucault, M. Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison. París: Gallimard, 1975.
Foucault, M. Histoire de la sexualité, 4 voll., París: Gallimard, 1976, 1984, 2018.
Foucault, M. Technologies of the Self. A Seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts, 1988.
Freud, S. Tre saggi sulla teoria sessuale (1905). Milán: bur, 2010.
Freud, S. Scritti sulla sessualità femminile (1924-1932). Turín: Bollati Boringhieri, 1976.
Gay, R. Bad Feminist. Essay. Nueva York: Harper Perennial, 2014.
Gill, R. Postfeminist Media Culture. Elements of a Sensibility. En European Journal of Cultural Studies. 10, 2, 2007, 147-166.
Gilligan, C. In a Different Voice. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1982.
Gruppo di lavoro interuniversitario sulla soggettività politica delle donne. Soggettività politica delle donne. Donne-diritti-politica-potere. En Studi sulla questione criminale. 6, 3, 2011, 24-30.
Hacker, S. Doing It in The Hard Way: Investigations on Gender and Technology. Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1990.
Hacker, S. Pleasure, Power and Technology: Some Tales of Gender, Engineering, and the Cooperative Workplace. Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1989.
Haraway, D. A Cyborg Manifesto. En Socialist Review. 1985, 65-108 (nota editorial
contenida en Haraway. D. Simians, Cyborg and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. Londres: Routledge, 1991, 149-181).
Haraway, D. Situated Knowledges. The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspectives. En Feminist Studies. 14, 1988, 575-599.
Haraway, D. The Biopolitics of Postmodern Bodies. Determinations of Self in Immune System Discourse. En Differences. A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 1, 1989, 3-43.
Haraway, D. Primate Visions. Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science, Nueva York y Londres: Routledge, 1989.
Haraway, D. Simians, Cyborg and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. Londres: Routledge, 1991.
Haraway, D. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©Meets OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. Nueva York: Routledge, 1997.
Haraway, D. The Companion Species Manifesto. Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness, Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2003.
Haraway, D. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.
Haraway, D. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016.
Harcourt, W. (ed.), Women@internet. Creating New Cultures in Cyberspace. Londres: Zed Books, 2000.
Henry, A. Not My Mother’s Sister. Generational Conflict and Third Wave Feminism.
Bloomington e Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2004.
Hester, H. Xenofeminism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018.
Hilbert, M. Digital Gender Divide or Technologically Empowered Women in Developing Countries? A Typical Case of Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics. En Women’s Studies International Forum. 6, 2011, 479-489.
Lohan, M. y Faulkner, W. Masculinities and Technologies. En Men and Masculinities. 4, 2000, 319-329.
Long Chu, A. Females. Londres: Verso, 2018.
Nietzsche, F. Götzen-Dämmerung oder Wie man mit dem Hammer philosophirt (1889). Leipzig: Naumann, 1893.
Minda, G. Postmodern Legal Movements. Law and Jurisprudence at Century’s End. Nueva York y Londres: New York University Press, 1995.
Papastergiou, M. Are Computer Science and Information Technology Still Masculine Fields? High School Students’ Perceptions and Career Choices. En Computer & Education. 51, 2008, 594-608.
Pastore, B. Prefazione. En Bernardini, M. G. y Giolo, O. (eds.), Le teorie critiche del diritto. Pisa: Pacini, 2017.
Plant, S. Zeroes and Ones: Digital Women and the New Technoculture. Nueva York: Doubleday, 1997.
Pozzolo, S., Bencivenga, R. y Bosco, F. (eds.). Genere e tecnologia: nuove capacitazioni o antichi pregiudizi mascherati? En About Gender. Rivista internazionale di studi di genere. 5, 9, 2016.
Preciado, P. B. Testo yonqui. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, 2008 (trad. inglesa ampliada: Testo Junkie: Sex, Drugs, and Biopolitics in the Pharmacopornographic Era. Nueva York: Feminist Press, 2013).
Preciado, P. B. Le lezioni del virus. En Internazionale. 1356, 2020, 82-88.
Puente, S. From Cyberfeminism to Technofeminism: From an Essentialist Perspective to Social Cyberfeminism in Certain Feminist Practices in Spain. En Women’s Studies International Forum. 31, 2008, 434-440.
Rodeschini, S. Il confine tra scienza e politica. Lo sguardo cyborg di Donna Haraway. En Cosmopolis. 2016. Disponible en: https://www.cosmopolisonline.it/articolo.php?numero=xiii12016&id=10
Rose, H. Hand, Brain, and Heart. En Signs. Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 1, 1983, 73-96.
Shelley, M. Frankenstein (1818). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Shiva, V. y Mies, M. Ecofeminism. Londres: Zed, 1993 (2014).
Solanas, V. SCUM Manifesto. Londres: Verso, 1967.
Tronto, J. Moral Boundaries. A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. Nueva York: Routledge, 1993.
Turri, M. G. (ed.). Manifesto per un nuovo femminismo. Milán: Mimesis, 2013.
Vantin, S. Digital Gender Divide e ict. Il femminismo alla prova della rivoluzione tecnologica. En Il senso della Repubblica nel xxi secolo. Quaderni di Storia e Filosofia. 10, 2015, 9-10.
Vantin, S. L’eguaglianza di genere tra mutamenti sociali e nuove tecnologie. Percorsi di diritto antidiscriminatorio. Pisa: Pacini, 2018.
Vicente Giménez, T., Marzocco, V., Pozzolo, S. y Farano, A. La subjetividad políticojurídica de las mujeres y la biotecnología como política de reproducción. En Bioderecho. es. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Bioderecho. 3, 2016.
Wajcman, J. Feminism Confronts Technology. University Drive (PA): Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991.
Wajcman, J. Technofeminism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004.
World Economic Forum. Global Gender Gap Report 2020. Disponible en: https://www.weforum.org/reports/gender-gap-2020-report-100-years-pay-equality
Citado por
