Poder y cambio institucional: de la dependencia de la trayectoria a las teorías del cambio gradual
Power and institutional change: From path dependence to theories of gradual change
Barra lateral del artículo
PDF
FLIP
HTML
XML
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El institucionalismo histórico da especial importancia teórica al poder en la comprensión de las instituciones, pero cuando adopta el concepto de dependencia de la trayectoria para explicar el cambio institucional cae en un dilema teórico: la dependencia de la trayectoria es atractiva pues da de gran autonomía a la dimensión institucional, pero la aísla de la influencia de las asimetrías de poder. Las teorías posteriores del cambio endógeno y gradual intentan solucionar este problema reintroduciendo el poder, pero dan lugar a un panorama fragmentado y repleto de tensiones teóricas.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Referencias (VER)
Arrow, K. J. (1950). A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. Journal of political economy, 58(4), 328-346.
Campbell, J. L. (2010a). Institutional reproduction and change. The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis, 87-116.
Campillo, I. y Sola, J. (2020). Power resources theory: A critical reassesment. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 170, 19-34.
Capoccia, G. (2016). When do institutions “bite”? Historical institutionalism and the politics of institutional change. Comparative Political Studies, 49(8), 1095-1127.
Collier, D., Munck, G. L. et al. (2017). Symposium on critical junctures and historical legacies. Symposium on Critical Junctures and Historical Legacies, 1-47.
Collier, R. B. y Collier, D. (2002). Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America, [https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8qr1z7gc].
Conran, J. y Thelen, K. A. (2016). Institutional change. En O. Fioretos, T. G. Falleti y A. Sheingate (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical institutionalism (pp. 51-70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 332-337.
David, P. A. (2007). Path dependence: A foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica, 1(2), 91-114.
Davis, L. y North, D. (1970). Institutional change and American economic growth: A first step towards a theory of institutional innovation. The Journal of Economic History, 30(1), 131-149.
DellaPosta, D., Nee, V. y Opper, S. (2017). Endogenous dynamics of institutional change. Rationality and Society, 29(1), 5-48.
Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D. y Skocpol, T. (eds.), (1985). Bringing the state back in. Cambridge-Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Fligstein, N. (2008). Fields, power and social skill: A critical analysis of the New Institutionalisms. International Public Management Review, 9(1), 227-253.
Fligstein, N. y Shin, T. (2007). Shareholder value and the transformation of the U.S. economy, 1984-2001. Sociological Forum, 22(4), 399-424.
Geddes, B. (2003). Paradigms and sand castles: Theory building and research design in comparative politics. University of Michigan Press.
Goodin, R. E. y Klingemann, H.-D. (1996). A new handbook of political science. Oxford: OUP.
Greif, A. y Laitin, D. D. (2004). A theory of endogenous institutional change. American political science review, 98(4), 633-652.
Hacker, J. S. (2004). Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 243-260.
Hall, P. A. (2010). Historical institutionalism in rationalist and sociological perspective. En J. Mahoney y H. Thelen (eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power (pp. 204-224). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, P. A. y Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political studies, 44(5), 936-957.
Heijden, J. van der, y Kuhlmann, J. (2017). Studying incremental institutional change: A systematic and critical meta-review of the literature from 2005 to 2015. Policy Studies Journal, 45(3), 535-554.
Henig, J. (2008). Education policy from 1980 to the present: The politics of privatization. En B. J Glenn y S. M Teles (eds.), Conservatism in American Political Development (pp. 291-323). Oxford-Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Ikenberry, G. J. (1994). History’s heavy hand: Institutions and the politics of the state. Manuscrito no publicado.
Immergut, E. M. (1998). The theoretical core of the new institutionalism. Politics & Society, 26(1), 5-34.
Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and social conflict. Cambridge-Nueva York; Cambridge University Press.
Korpi, W. (1983). Democratic class struggle. Nueva York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Krasner, S. D. (1984). Approaches to the State: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics, 16(2), 223-246.
Lomazoff, E. (2012). Turning (into) “The great regulating wheel”: The conversion of the Bank of the United States, 1791-1811. Studies in American Political Development, 26(1), 1-23.
Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507-548.
Mahoney, J. (2001). The legacies of Liberalism: Path dependence and political regimes in Central America. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Mahoney, J. y Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. En J. Mahoney y K. Thelen (eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power (pp. 1-37). Cambridge-Nueva York: Cambridge University Press
Mahoney, J. y Schensul, D. (2006) Historical context and path dependence. En R. E. Goodin y C. Tilli (eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
March, J. G. y Olsen, J. P. (1983). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American political science review, 78(3), 734-749.
Meyer, J. W. y Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Peters, B. G. (2003). El nuevo institucionalismo: la teoría institucional en ciencia política. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251-267.
Pierson, P. (2006). Sobrellevando la austeridad permanente: reestructuración del Estado de Bienestar en las democracias desarrolladas. Zona abierta, 114, 43-120.
Pierson, P. y Skocpol, T. (2002). Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. En I. Katznelson y H. V. Milner (eds.), Political science: The state of the discipline (pp. 693-721). Nueva York: W.W. Norton.
Roberts, K. M. (2013). Market reform, programmatic (de)alignment, and party system stability in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 46(11), 1422-1452.
Rocco, P. y Thurston, C. (2014). From metaphors to measures: Observable indicators of gradual institutional change. Journal of Public Policy, 34(1), 35-62.
Rothstein, B. (1996). Political institutions: An overview. En R. E. Goodin y H.-D. Klingemann (eds.), A new handbook of political science (pp. 133-166). Oxford-Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Sait, E. M. (1938). Political institutions: A preface. Century Political series. Nueva York: D. Appleton-Century Company.
Sewell, W. H. (1996). Three temporalities: Toward an eventful sociology. En T. J. McDonald (ed.), The historic turn in the human sciences (pp. 245-280). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Schickler, E. (2001). Disjointed pluralism: Institutional innovation and the development of the US Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Skocpol, T. (1995). Protecting soldiers and mothers. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Slater, D. y Simmons, E. (2010). Informative regress: Critical antecedents in comparative politics. Comparative Political Studies, 43(7), 886-917.
Soifer, H. D. (2012). The causal logic of critical junctures. Comparative political studies, 45(12), 1572-1597.
Steinmo, S. y Thelen, K. (1992). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. En Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 1-32). Cambridge-Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Thelen, K. (1999). Historical Institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 369-404.
Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge-Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Trigo, L. G. (2015). El debate sobre la noción de path dependence y su conciliación en un modelo dinámico de análisis institucional. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia Política, 6(1), 81-107.
Weingast, B. R. y Marshall, W. J. (1988). The industrial organization of Congress; or, why legislatures, like firms, are not organized as markets. Journal of Political Economy, 96(1), 132-163.
Weyland, K. (2008). Toward a new theory of institutional change. World Politics, 60(2), 281-314.
Citado por
