Modelación matemática e ideología en la economía académica
Mathematical modelling and ideology in the economics academy
Barra lateral del artículo
PDF
FLIP
Cómo citar
[1]
Lawson, T. 2014. Modelación matemática e ideología en la economía académica. Revista de Economía Institucional. 16, 30 (jun. 2014).
Publicado:
Jun 13, 2014
Sección
Artículos
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Las fallas generalizadas y duraderas de la economía académica se deben a la excesiva confianza en métodos de análisis matemáticos inapropiados. Muchos economistas heterodoxos piensan que el problema central es una forma de ideología político-económica, que la disciplina va por mal camino porque muchos economistas describen la economía de mercado como un sistema que funciona eficientemente, una descripción que, así sea sincera, es inconsistente con el funcionamiento de la realidad social. Este artículo examina la pretensión de que esa forma de ideología es el problema principal, evalúa su poder explicativo y concluye que no es una buena explicación.
Palabras clave:
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Detalles del artículo
Referencias (VER)
Bigo, V. “Explaining modern economics (as a microcosm of society)”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 32, 4, 2008, pp. 527-554.
Bloom, A. The closing of the American mind, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1987.
Coats, A. W. On the history of economic thought: British and American economic essays, vol. I, London y New York, Routledge, 1992.
Colander, D.; R. P. Holt, y J. B. Rosser Jr. “The changing face of mainstream economics”, Review of Political Economy 16, 4, 2004, 485-500.
Colander, D.; H. Follmer; A. Hass et al. “The financial crisis and the systemic failure of academic economics”, mimeo, 2008, [http://www. debtdeflation.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/papers/Dahlem_Report_ EconCrisis021809.pdf ].
Davis, J. B. “Heterodox economics, the fragmentation of the mainstream and embedded individual analysis”, R. Garnett y J. Harvey, eds., The future of heterodox economics, Ann Arbor, MI, University of
Michigan Press, 2005.
Dixon, H. “Equilibrium and explanation”, J. Creedy, ed., Foundations of economic thought, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1990.
Eagleton, T. Ideology: An introduction, London, Verso, 1991.
Fullbrook, E. Ontology and economics: Tony Lawson and his critics, London y New York, Routledge, 2009.
Gillies, D. “Can mathematics be used successfully in economics?”, E. Fullbrook, ed., A guide to what’s wrong with economics, London, Anthem Press, 2004, pp. 187-197.
Gingras, Y. “What did mathematics do to physics?”, History of Science 39, 4, 2001, pp. 383-416.
Goodwin, C. D. “The patrons of economics in a time of transformation”, M. S. Morgan y M. Rutherford, eds., From interwar pluralism to postwar neoclassicism, annual supplement to vol. 30, History of Political Economy, Duke, Duke University Press, 1998.
Guerrien, B. “Irrelevance and ideology”, Post-Autistic Economics Review 29, 6, 2004, article 3.
Hahn, F. H. “Some adjustment problems”, Econometrica 38, 1, 1970, pp. 1-17.
Hahn, F. H. Money and inflation, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1982.
Hahn, F. H. “Reflections”, Royal Economics Society Newsletter 77, 1992a.
Hahn, F. H. “Answer to Backhouse: Yes”, Royal Economic Society Newsletter 78, 1992b.
Hahn, F. H. “An intellectual retrospect”, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 190, 1994, pp. 245-258.
Henry, J. The scientific revolution and the origins of modern science, New York, 1997.
Bloom, A. The closing of the American mind, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1987.
Coats, A. W. On the history of economic thought: British and American economic essays, vol. I, London y New York, Routledge, 1992.
Colander, D.; R. P. Holt, y J. B. Rosser Jr. “The changing face of mainstream economics”, Review of Political Economy 16, 4, 2004, 485-500.
Colander, D.; H. Follmer; A. Hass et al. “The financial crisis and the systemic failure of academic economics”, mimeo, 2008, [http://www. debtdeflation.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/papers/Dahlem_Report_ EconCrisis021809.pdf ].
Davis, J. B. “Heterodox economics, the fragmentation of the mainstream and embedded individual analysis”, R. Garnett y J. Harvey, eds., The future of heterodox economics, Ann Arbor, MI, University of
Michigan Press, 2005.
Dixon, H. “Equilibrium and explanation”, J. Creedy, ed., Foundations of economic thought, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1990.
Eagleton, T. Ideology: An introduction, London, Verso, 1991.
Fullbrook, E. Ontology and economics: Tony Lawson and his critics, London y New York, Routledge, 2009.
Gillies, D. “Can mathematics be used successfully in economics?”, E. Fullbrook, ed., A guide to what’s wrong with economics, London, Anthem Press, 2004, pp. 187-197.
Gingras, Y. “What did mathematics do to physics?”, History of Science 39, 4, 2001, pp. 383-416.
Goodwin, C. D. “The patrons of economics in a time of transformation”, M. S. Morgan y M. Rutherford, eds., From interwar pluralism to postwar neoclassicism, annual supplement to vol. 30, History of Political Economy, Duke, Duke University Press, 1998.
Guerrien, B. “Irrelevance and ideology”, Post-Autistic Economics Review 29, 6, 2004, article 3.
Hahn, F. H. “Some adjustment problems”, Econometrica 38, 1, 1970, pp. 1-17.
Hahn, F. H. Money and inflation, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1982.
Hahn, F. H. “Reflections”, Royal Economics Society Newsletter 77, 1992a.
Hahn, F. H. “Answer to Backhouse: Yes”, Royal Economic Society Newsletter 78, 1992b.
Hahn, F. H. “An intellectual retrospect”, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 190, 1994, pp. 245-258.
Henry, J. The scientific revolution and the origins of modern science, New York, 1997.