Regulación de plataformas: análisis crítico 2007-2022
Platform Regulation: Critical Analysis 2007-2022
Barra lateral del artículo
PDF
FLIP
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
La discusión sobre la regulación de plataformas se ha centrado, tanto en la academia, como en organismos internacionales y agencias de la competencia, en las herramientas del modelo neoclásico de regulación: cuotas de mercado y análisis de bienestar, entre otras. Más recientemente el big data y los algoritmos han pasado a ser centrales en estos debates. El objetivo de este artículo es analizar, desde una perspectiva crítica, la evolución de esta discusión, su impacto en las diferentes propuestas legislativas, y el largo período que llevó a la Unión Europea a adoptar, en 2022, la regulación de estas corporaciones. Adicionalmente, se sugieren nuevos instrumentos de políticas públicas que puedan superar estas nuevas normativas.
Palabras clave:
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Referencias (VER)
Access Act (2021). Text - H.R.3849 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): ACCESS Act of 2021. (2021, junio 24). https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3849/text
American innovation and Choice online Act (2021). Text - S.2992 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): American Innovation and Choice Online Act. (2022, marzo 2). https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/2992/text
Andriychuk, O. (2022). Shifting the digital paradigm: towards a sui generis competition policy.
Computer Law & Security Review, Volumen 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105733
Branka, B. (9 de enero de 2023). Apps statistics 2023. Truelist. https://truelist.co/blog/apps-statistics/
Bolano, C. (2022). Economia política, globalizaçao e comunicaçao. Revista Novos Rumos, (25). https://doi.org/10.36311/0102-5864.11.v0n25.2047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36311/0102-5864.11.v0n25.2047
Bourreau, M.; de Streel, A.; Graef, I. (2017). Big Data and Competition Policy: Market power, personalised pricing and advertising. Bruselas: Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2920301
Butschan, J.; Heidenreich, S.; Weber, B.; Kraemer, T.. (2019). Tackling Hurdles to digital transformation – The role of competencies for successful industrial internet of things (IIoT) implementation. International Journal of Innovation Management. 23 (04). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919619500361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919619500361
Ciriani, S., & Lebourges, M. (2018). The market dominance of US digital platforms: antitrust implications for the European Union. Available at SSRN 2977933. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2977933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2977933
Cyphers, B., & Doctorow, C. (2021). Privacy without monopoly: data protection and interoperability. Electronic Frontier Foundation, 12. https://www.eff.org/wp/interoperability-and-privacy
COM (2016a). Reglamento 2016/679 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, del 27 de abril de 2016, relativo a la protección de las personas físicas en lo que respecta al tratamiento de datos personales y a la libre circulación de estos datos y por el que se deroga la Directiva 95/46/CE (Reglamento general de protección de datos) (Texto pertinente a efectos del EEE). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&from=ES
COM (2016b). Comunicación de la Comisión al Parlamento Europeo, al Consejo, al Comité Económico y Social europeo y al Comité de las regiones. Las plataformas en línea y el mercado único digital. Retos y oportunidades para Europa. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal content/ES/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52016DC0288
COM (2017). Comunicación de la Comisión al Parlamento Europeo, al Consejo, al Comité Económico y Social Europea y al Comité de las Regiones. La construcción de una economía de los datos europea. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0009&from=EN
COM (2020). Communication from the commission to the european parliament, the council, the european economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. A European strategy for data. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0066
COM (2022a). Propuesta de Reglamento del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo relativo a un mercado único de servicios digitales (Ley de servicios digitales) y por el que se modifica la directiva 2000/31/CE. https://eur lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020PC0825&from=ES
COM (2022b). Propuesta de Reglamento del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo sobre mercados disputables y equitativos en el sector digital (Ley de mercados digitales). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020PC0842&from=ES
COMP (2014). Case N° COMP/M.7217 - FACEBOOK/ WHATSAPP. Regulation (EC) N° 139/2004. Merger procedure. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m7217_20141003_20310_3962132_EN.pdf
COMP (2017). Antitrust: Commission fines Google €2.42 billion for abusing dominance as search engine by giving illegal advantage to own comparison shopping service – Press Release. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_17_1785
COMP (2018). Antitrust: Commission fines Google €4.34 billion for illegal practices regarding Android mobile devices to strengthen dominance of Google’s search engine. Press Release. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_4581
COMP (2019). Antitrust: Commission fines Google €1.49 billion for abusive practices in online advertising. Press Release. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_1770
de Bustos, J. C. M. (2016). Los grupos mundiales de comunicación y de entretenimiento, en el camino hacia la digitalización. Les enjeux de l’information et de la communication, (2), 127-144. https://www.cairn.info/revue-les-enjeux-de-l-information-et-de-la-communication-2016-2-page-127.htm DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/enic.021.0127
DOJ (2010). Statement of the Department of Justice Antitrust Division on Its Decision to Close Its Investigation of the Internet Search and Paid Search Advertising Agreement Between Microsoft Corporation and Yahoo! Inc. Press Release Number: 10-163.https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/
statement-department-justice-antitrust-division-its-decision-closeits-investigation-internet
Dolata, U. (2017). Apple, Amazon, Google, Facebook, Microsoft: Market concentration - competition - innovation strategies, SOI Discussion Paper, No. 2017-01. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/152249
Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard business review, 84(10), 92. https://www.binhphuongnguyen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/HBR-Strategyfor-2-side-market-Egg-and-Chicken-Dilemma-Startup.pdf
Ending platform monopolies Act (2021) Text - H.R.3825 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Ending Platform Monopolies Act. (2021, junio 24). https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3825/text
Evans, D. (2013). Economics of Vertical Restraints for Multi-Sided Platforms”. Coase Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Working Paper No. 626, 2013). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2195778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2195778
FTC (2007a). Statement of Federal Trade Commission Concerning Google/DoubleClick. Matter Number No. 071-0170. https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/public-statements/statement-federal-trade-commission-concerning-googledoubleclick
FTC (2007b) Statement of the Federal Trade Commission Concerning Google/DoubleClick. Matter Number 071 0170. https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/public-statements/statementfederal-trade-commission-concerning-googledoubleclick
FTC (2013). Statement of the Federal Trade Commission Regarding Google’s Search Practices In the Matter of Google Inc. FTC File Number 111-0163. https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/public_statements/statement-commission-regarding-googles-search-practices/130103brillgooglesearchstmt.pdf
FTC (2019). FTC Imposes $5 Billion Penalty and Sweeping New Privacy Restrictions on Facebook. FTC settlement imposes historic penalty, and significant requirements to boost accountability and transparency. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2019/07/ftc-imposes-
-billionpenalty-sweeping-new-privacy-restrictions-facebook
FTC (2020). FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization. Agency challenges Facebook’s multi-year course of unlawful conduct. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2020/12/ftc-sues-facebookillegalmonopolization
Flew, T. (2019). The platformized internet: issues for internet law and policy. Journal of Internet Law, 22(11), páginas: 3-16. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3395901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3395901
Graef, I. (2015). Market definition and market power in data: the case of online platforms (September 8, 2015). World Competition: Law and Economics Review, Vol. 38, No. 4 (2015), p. 473-506. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2657732o DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/WOCO2015040
Hagiu, A.; Wright, J. (2020). When data creates competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review. January-February 2020. https://hbr.org/2020/01/when-data-creates-competitive-advantage
Haucap, J. & Heimeshoff, U. (2014). Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the Internet driving competition or market monopolization?. International Economics and Economic Policy. 11 (49-61). https://doi. org/10.1007/s10368-013-0247-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-013-0247-6
Just, N. (2018). Governing online platforms: Competition policy in times of platformization. Telecommunications Policy, 42, Tema 5, páginas: 386-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.02.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.02.006
Khan, Lina. (2017). Amazon’s antitrust paradox. The Yale Law Journal 126, 3. Pp 701 – 805. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/e.710. Khan.805_zuvfyyeh.pdf
Ma, Jingyuang (2022). Regulating data monopolies. A Law and Economics Perspective. Singapure Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8766-2
Mastrini, G. &Becerra, M.(2006). Periodistas y magnates. Estructura y concentración de las industrias culturales. Buenos Aires Prometeo
Merger filing fee Modernization Act (2021). H.R.3843 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act of 2022. (2022, octubre 11). https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3843
Mileva, G. (27 de abril de 2023) Amazing Amazon statistics you need to know to amplify growth in 2023. Influencer Marketing Hub. https://influencermarketinghub.com/amazon-statistics/
Moon, H.; Kim, K.; and Park, J. (2017), Ecosystem Design of Big Data through Previous Study Analysis in the World: Policy Design for Big Data as Public Goods, 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress), Honolulu, HI, USA, 2017, pp. 525-528, doi: 10.1109/BigDataCongress.2017.79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDataCongress.2017.79
Motta, M., & Peitz, M. (2021). Big tech mergers.Information Economics and Policy, 54, 100868. Cite https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2020.100868 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2020.100868
Nadler, J.; Cicceline, D. (2020). Investigation of competition in digital markets. Washington: US House of Representatives. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CPRT-117HPRT47832/pdf/CPRT-117HPRT47832.pdf
Nicoli, N., & Iosifidis, P. (2023). EU digital economy competition policy: From ex-post to ex-ante. The case of Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, and Meta.Global Media and China. https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364231152673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364231152673
OCDE. (2022). Manual de la OCDE sobre política de competencia en la era digital, https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition-policy-in-thedigital-age
OCDE. (2020a). Abuse of dominance in digital markets, http://www.oecd. org/daf/competition/abuse-of-dominance-in-digital-markets-2020.pdf
OCDE. (2020b). Consumer data rights and competition—Background note by the Secretariat. Directorate for Financial and Enterprises Affairs Competition Committee, June 10–12, 2020. DAF/COMP (2020)1. http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/consumer-data-rights-and-competition.htm
OCDE. (2014). Data-driven innovation for growth and well-being: Interim synthesis report. http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/data-driven-innovationinterim-synthesis.pdf
OCDE. (2013). Exploring Data-Driven Innovation as a New Source of Growth: Mapping the Policy Issues Raised by Big Data, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 222,
OCDE Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k47zw3fcp43- en OCDE. (2010). The economic and social role of Internet intermediaries.
OECD Digital Economy Papers, April 2010. https://www.oecd.org/digital/ieconomy/44949023.pdf
Persch, J. (2021) Google Shopping: The General Court takes its position. 15/11/2021. Kluwer Competition Law Blog. https://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2021/11/15/google-shopping-thegeneral-court-takes-its-position/
Platform and competition opportunity Act (2021). H.R.3826 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Platform Competition and Opportunity Act of 2021. (2021, junio 24). https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3826
Prat, A., & Valletti, T. (2022). Attention oligopoly. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 14(3), 530-57. doi: 10.1257/mic.20200134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20200134
Richter, F. (4 de febrero de 2021). Facebook Keeps On Growing. Statista, https://www.statista.com/chart/10047/facebooks-monthly-active-users/
Ruby, D. (6 de junio de 2023) YouTube statistics. Insights and infographics. https://www.demandsage.com/youtube-stats/
Sandvine (2023). The global internet phenomena report. Phenomena https://www.sandvine.com/global-internet-phenomena-report-2023
Sokol, D. and Comerford, R. (2016). Antitrust and regulating big data. George Mason Law Review. 119. University of Florida Levin College of Law Research Paper No. 16-40. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2834611
Srnicek, N. (2018). Capitalismo de plataformas. Buenos Aires. Caja Negra.
Stucke, M. (2018). Should we be concerned about data-opolies? Georgetown Law Technology Review 275 (2018), University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 349. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3144045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144045
Stucke, M. E., & Grunes, A. P. (2016). Introduction: big data and competition policy. Big Data and Competition Policy, Oxford University Press (2016). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2849074
Tirole, J. (2022), ‘Competition and the industrial challenge for the digital age?’, IFS Deaton Review of Inequalities, https://ifs.org.uk/inequality/competition-and-the-industrial-challenge-for-the-digital-age
Tirole, Jean (2020). Competition and the Industrial Challenge for the Digital Age. Working paper. https://www.tsefr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/documents/doc/by/tirole/competition_and_the_industrial_challenge_april_3_2020.pdf
Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT Press.
Zallo, R. (1988). Economía de la Comunicación y la Cultura. Madrid Ediciones Akal.
Citado por
