Paternalismo, escravidão, direitos de propriedade e casamento em John Stuart Mill
Barra lateral de artigos
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
XML (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Até que ponto a liberdade individual deve chegar? John Stuart Mill, defensor desse valor, argumentou que não se podia ser livre para não ser livre e apresentou como caso extremo o exemplo de alguém que se vende voluntariamente como escravo. Esse exemplo gerou um debate animado sobre a consistência de suas posições. Este artigo analisa esse debate e procura esclarecer as visões de Mill a partir de várias linhas convergentes: o paternalismo, a escravidão, os direitos de propriedade e a intervenção estatal na economia, e o casamento e a igualdade de gênero
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
Referências (assistir)
Archard, D. (1990). Freedom not to be free: The case of the slavery contract in J.S. Mill’s On liberty. Philosophical Quarterly, 40(161), 453-465.
Arneson, R. J. (1980). Mill versus paternalism. Ethics, 90(4), 470-489.
Arneson, R. J. (1997). Paternalism, utility and fairness. En G. Dworkin, ed., Mill’s On liberty: Critical essays (pp. 83-114). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Cooter, R. y Ulen, T. (2002). Derecho y economía. México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Dworkin, G. (1997). Paternalism. En G. Dworkin, ed. Mill’s On liberty: Critical essays (pp. 61-82). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Dworkin, G. (2017). Paternalism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/paternalism/].
Feinberg, J. (1971). Legal paternalism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1(1), 105-124.
Frederick, D. (2014). Voluntary slavery. Las Torres de Lucca, 4, 115-137.
Fuchs, A.G. (2001). Autonomy, slavery and Mill’s critique of paternalism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 4(3), 231-251.
Hamburger, J. (1999). Mill on liberty and control. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hare, R. M. (1979). What is wrong with slavery. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 8(2), 103-121.
Hayek, F. A. (1951). John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor: Their friendship and subsequent marriage. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Knight, F. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Mill, H. T. (1852). Enfranchisement of women. En John M. Robson (ed.), The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, XXI (pp. 393-416) .Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Mill, J. S. (1832). Essay on marriage and divorce. En F. A. Hayek, John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor: Their friendship and subsequent marriage. Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mill, J. S. (1850). The negro question. Littell’s Living Age version, 465-469.
Mill, J. S. (1869). The subjection of women. Nueva York: D. Appleton and Company.
Mill, J. S. (varios). Las demás referencias citadas en el texto provienen de John M. Robson, ed. (1963-1991). The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Moloney, P. (2011). John Stuart Mill on savagery, slavery and civilization, [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1976870].
Offen, K. (2001).How (and why) the analogy of marriage with slavery provided the springboard for women’s rights demands in France. Proceedings of the Third Gilman Lehrman Center International Conference at Yale University (pp. 1-16). New Haven: Yale University.
Pérez S., M. (2003). La razón liberal: economía, política y ética en la obra de John Stuart Mill. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Scheidel, W. (2007). The Roman slave supply. Princeton: Stanford working papers in classics.
Shanley, M. L. (1981). Marital slavery and friendship: John Stuart Mill’s The subjection of women. Political Theory, 9(2), 229-247.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Nueva York: Knopf.
Stephen, J. F. (1997). The doctrine of liberty in its application to morals. En G. Dworkin, ed., Mill’s On liberty: Critical essays (167-178). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Ten, C. L. (1980). Mill on liberty, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Citado por
