Ejecución de medidas cautelares decretadas por árbitros de emergencia en arbitraje comercial internacional: preocupaciones y posibles soluciones
Execution of precautionary measures issued by emergency arbitrators in international arbitration: concerns and possible solutions
Barra lateral del artículo
PDF
FLIP
HTML
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Dada la importancia de las medidas cautelares dentro del proceso arbitral a efectos de garantizar el cumplimiento del laudo, surge la figura del árbitro de emergencia como competente para establecer la medida. Surge sin embargo la problemática de establecer de un lado la naturaleza de sus decisiones y la posibilidad de hacerlas exigibles a través de la ejecución en el arbitraje comercial internacional.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Referencias (VER)
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Rules.
Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration (ACICA) Rules 2016.
Bassler, William G. The Enforceability of Emergency Awards in the United States: or When Interim Means Final. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 9 (2018): 559.
Blackaby, Nigel, Constantine Partasides, Alan Redfern y Martin Hunter. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198714248.001.0001
Boog, Christopher. Chapter 17, Part ii: Commentary on the ICC Rules, Appendix v: Emergency Arbitrator Rules, Article 6 [Order]. En Arbitration in Switzerland: The Practitioner’s Guide, editado por Manuel Arroyo. Kluwer Law International, 2018.
Born, Gary B. International Commercial Arbitration. Kluwer Law International, 2014.
Brekoulakis, Stavros. Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: Observations on The Efficiency of The Current System and The Gradual Development of Alternative Means of Enforcement. The American Review of International Ar¬bitration, Vol. 19 Nros. 3-4 (2008): 415
Cavalieros, Philippe y Janet Kim. Emergency Arbitrators Versus the Courts: From Concurrent Jurisdiction to Practical Considerations. Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 35, Ed: 3 (2018): 275.
Chartered Institute of Arbitrators ciArb 2015 Arbitration Rules.
Comisión de las Naciones Unidas para el Derecho Mercantil Internacional. Ley Modelo de la CNUDMI sobre Arbitraje Comercial Internacional 1985 con las enmiendas aprobadas en 2006.
Corte para el Distrito Sur de Nueva York. Ecopetrol v. Offshore Exploration & Production (S.D.N.Y. 2014).
Fry, Jason. The Emergency Arbitrator–Flawed Fashion or Sensible Solution. Dispute Resolution International, Vol. 7 (2013): 179.
Gaillard, Emmanuel. Interim and Emergency Measures of Protection (BCDR Rules 2017, Arts 26 & 14). BCDR International Arbitration Review, Vol. 4 Ed: 2 (2017): 297.
Ghaffari, Amir, y Emmylou Walters. The Emergency Arbitrator: The Dawn of a New Age? Arbitration International, Vol: 30 Ed:1 (2014): 152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/30.1.153
Giaretta, Ben. The Practice of Emergency Arbitration. b- Arbitra | Belgian Review of Arbitration, Vol. 2017 Ed: 1 (2017): 83.
Hill, Jonathan. Is an Interim Measure of Protection Ordered by an Arbitral Tribunal an Arbitral Award? Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 9(2018): 590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idy023
Hirst, Peter y David Brown. Interim Relief, including Emergency Arbitration, in Construction Arbitration. En Global Arbitration Review: The Guide to Cons¬truction Arbitration, editado por Stavros Brekoulakis y David Brynmor. Londres: Law Business Research Ltd, 2017.
Hong Kong Arbitration Act.
Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre Rules (HKIA) Rules.
International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR) Rules.
International Chamber of Commerce Arbitration Rules.
International Council for Commercial Arbitration. ICCA’S Guide to the Interpreta¬tion of the 1958 New York Convention: A Handbook for Judges. International Council for Commercial Arbitration, 2011).
Lew, Julian D.M., Loukas A. Mistelis y Stefan Kröll. Comparative International Commercial Arbitration. La Haya: Kluwer Law International, 2003.
London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) Rules.
Marchisio, Giacomo. The Notion of Award in International Commercial Arbi¬tration: A Comparative Analysis of French Law, English Law, and the uncitral Model Law. Kluwer Law International, 2017.
Mourre, Alexis, y Luca G. Radicati Di Brozolo. Towards Finality of Arbitral Awards: Two Steps Forward and One Step Back. Journal of International Arbi¬tration, Vol: 23 Ed: 2 (2006): 171.
New Zealand Arbitration Act 1996.
Paraguacuto-Mahéo, Diana, y Christine Lecuyer-Thieffry. Emergency Arbi¬trator: A New Player in the Field–The French Perspective. Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 40 ed: 3 (2017): 750.
Queen Mary University of London’s School of International Arbitration y White & Case. 2015 International Arbitration Survey: Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration. Londres, 2015. http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/2015_International_Arbitration_Survey.pdf.
Santens, Ank A., y JaroslavKudrna. The State of Play of Enforcement of Emergency Arbitrator Decisions. Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 34 Ed:1 (2017): 1.
Singapore Arbitration Act.
Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) Rules.
Valasek, Martin J., y Jenna Anne de Jong. Enforceability of Interim Measures and Emergency Arbitrator Decisions. Norton Rose Fulbright International Ar¬bitration Report, Vol. 10 (2018): 17.
Yesilirmak, Ali. Chapter 9: Provisional Measures, en Pervasive Problems in Inter¬national Arbitration, International Arbitration Law Library, editado por Loukas A. Mistelis y Julian D.M. Lew. Kluwer Law International, 2006, 199.
Yesilirmak, Ali. Emergency Arbitral Provisional Measures. Provisional Measures in International Commercial Arbitration, Vol. 12(2005): 114.
Citado por
