Reflexiones sobre la política exterior de Taiwán: entre espacios reales e imaginados
The Relationship between Real and Imagined Spaces: Reflections on Taiwan’s Foreign Policy
Barra lateral del artículo
PDF
FLIP
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este artículo analiza la relación entre el contexto geográfico como un espacio físico y la narrativa histórica como un espacio imaginado en la conformación de la identidad nacional taiwanesa. Basado en la propuesta teórica del constructivismo, que enfatiza la importancia de la identidad en la conformación de los intereses de los Estados, se propone que las condiciones geográficas e históricas de Taiwán han desarrollado una identidad nacional distinta y diferenciada de la identidad china. Para ello, se asume una visión que sugiere que el contexto geográfico no solo genera condiciones materiales, sino también posibilita una serie de interacciones sociales que convierten al territorio también en un espacio “imaginado”, el cual es el resultado de narrativas históricas. Así, los elementos que conforman la identidad taiwanesa inciden en la política exterior de este Estado, particularmente en el caso de la búsqueda el reconocimiento internacional. Como conclusión, se destaca la manera en que el caso de Taiwán evidencia la forma como la identidad influye en la política exterior.
Palabras clave:
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Referencias (VER)
Addler, E. (2002). Constructivism and international relations. En W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse y B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of International Relations, pp. 95-118. Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608290.n5
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflection of Origen and Spread of Nationalism. Verso.
Benner, E. (2013). The origins of Nationalism. En J. Breuilly (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Nationalism (pp. 36-54). Oxford University Press.
Berenskoetter, F. (2010). Identity in International Relations. En R. A. Denemark y R. Marlin-Bennett (Eds.), The International Studies Encyclopedia, vol. 6. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.218
Bloom, W. (1990). Personal Identity, National Identity and International Relations. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558955
Brown, C. y Kirsten, A. (2005). Understanding International Relations. Palgrave McMillan.
Brown, M. J. (2004). Is Taiwan Chinese?: The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities. University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520231818.001.0001
Caspersen, N. (2012). Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System. Polity Press.
Chen, J. (2014). Building a new society on the base of locality: transformation of social forces in Taiwan during the 1990s. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 15 (2): 291-305. DOI:10.1080/14649373.2014.924644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2014.924644
Chen, Q. (2010). The Taiwan straits situation since ma came to office and conditions for cross-straits political negotiations: A view from Shanghai. Journal of Contemporary China, 20 (68): 153-160. DOI:10.1080/10670564.2011.520853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2011.520853
Cheng, J. y Paladini. S. (2014). China’s ocean development strategy and its handling of the territorial conflicts in the South China Sea. Philippine Political Science Journal, 35 (2): 185-202. DOI:10.1080/01154451.2014.965476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2014.965476
Chernoff, F. (2007). Theory and Metatheory in International Relations: concepts and contending accounts. Palgrave MacMillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230606883
Chu, Y. y Lin, C. (2003). Consolidating Taiwan’s new democracy amid competing national identities. En L. Fernández-Stembridge y T. Fisac (Eds.), China Today: Economic Reforms, Social Cohesion and Collective Identities (pp. 240-267). Routledge Curzon.
Chu, Y. y Lin, J. (2001). Political development in 20th- Century Taiwan: State-building, regime transformation and the construction of national identity. The China Quarterly, 165: 102129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009443901000067
Connelly, M. (2014). Historia de Taiwán. El Colegio de México.
Cox, R. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10 (2): 126-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501
Damm, J. (2011). From ‘overseas chinese’ to ‘overseas taiwanese’: Questions of identity and belonging.
Domestic, regional and global perspectives. En G. Schubert y J. Damm (Eds.), Taiwanese Identity in the 21st Century (pp. 51-71). Routledge.
Deans, P. (2005). Isolation, identity and Taiwanese stamps as vehicles for regime legitimation. East Asia, 22 (2): 8-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-005-0007-5
Dittmer, L. (2006). Taiwan as a factor in China’s quest for national identity. Journal of Contemporary China, 15 (49): 671-686. DOI:10.1080/10670560600836721 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560600836721
Eskildse, R. (2005). Taiwan: A periphery in search of a narrative. The Journal of Asian Studies, 64 (2): 281-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911805000781
Genest, M. A. (2004). Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations. Wadsworth.
George Wei, C. X. (2012). U.S.-China relations and its impact on the reconstruction of national identity in Taiwan. En B. Guo y C. Teng (Eds.), Taiwan and the Rise of China (pp. 51-72). Lexington Books.
Gold, T. (2008). Taiwan’s Quest for Identity in the Shadow of China. En D. Fell (ed.), The Politics of Modern Taiwan (pp.83-103). Routledge.
Griffiths, M., O’Callaghan, T. y Roach, S. (2008). International Relations: The Key Concepts. Routledge.
Harvey, J. y Stansfield, G. (2009). Theorizing unrecognized states: Sovereignty, secessionism, and political economy: James Harvey and Gareth Stansfield. En N. Caspersen y N. Stansfield, G. (Eds.), Unrecognized States in the International System (pp. 1-26). Routledge.
Hobson, J. (2000). The State and the International Relations. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612442
Holtug, N. (2017). Identity, causality and social cohesion. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43 (7): 1084-1100. DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2016.1227697 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1227697
Hopf, T. (1998). The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. International Security, 23 (1): 171-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.1.171
Hopf, T. (2002). Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies. Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Cornell University Press.
Hsü, I. C. Y. (2000). The Rise of Modern China. Oxford University Press.
Hughes, C. R. (2011). Negotiating National Identity in Taiwan: Between nativization and des-sicnization. En R. Ash, J. W. Garver y P. B. Prime (Eds.), Taiwan Democracy: Economic and Politics Challenges (pp. 51-74). Routledge.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94 (1): 7-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241
Jackson, R. (2005). Classical and Modern Thought on International Relations: From Anarchy to Cosmopolis. Palgrave McMillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979520
Jackson, R. y Sorensen, G. (2003). Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Oxford University Press.
Joint Communique between the United States and China (1972). History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/121325
Jung, H. (2019). The evolution of social constructivism in political science: Past to present. SAGE Open, 2 (1): 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832703
Kang, J., Kim, J. y Wang, Y. (2015). Salvaging national pride: The 2010 taekwondo controversy and Taiwan’s quest for global recognition. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 50 (1): 98-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690212474264
Kaufman, J. K. (2013). Introduction to International Relations: Theory and Practice. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Keith, R. C. (2017). Deng Xiaoping and China’s Foreign Policy. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315409696
Kim, S. (2018). Chinese foreign policy in theory and practice. En S. Kim (Ed.), China and The World: Chinese Foreign Policy Faces the New Millennium (pp. 3-33). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429501708-1
Kowert, P. (1998). Agent versus structure in the construction of national identity. En V. Kublákova, N. Onuf y P. Kowert (eds.), International Relations in a Constructed World (pp. 101-122). M. E. Sharpe. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315703299-5
Krasner, S. D. (2009). Power, the State, and Sovereignty: Essays on International Relations. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203882139
Laio, N. (2019). Identity, Role Conception, and Status Dilemma: A socio-psychological account of China-U.S. relations. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 5 (3): 343-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740019500180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740019500180
Lamley, H. (2007). Taiwan under japanese rule, 1895- 1945. The vicissitudes of colonialism. En M. A. Rubinstein (Ed.), Taiwan. A New History (pp.201-260). M. E. Sharpe. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003075530-8
Lemus, D. y Cerda, C. (2021). China or Taiwan? The tricky dilemma of diplomatic recognition: The salvadorean experience. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations, 7 (1): 45-78.
Lemus-Delgado, D. (2021). International sports events and national identity: The opening ceremony of the Taipei Universiade. Sport in Society, 24 (7): 1093- 1109. DOI: 10.1080/17430437.2020.1732929 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2020.1732929
Makeham, J. (2005). Introduction. En J. Makeham y A. Hsiau (Eds.), Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan (pp. 1-14). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980618_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980618_1
Mantorphe, J. (2009). Forbidden Nation: A History of Taiwan. Palgrave MacMillan.
McAllister, I. (2016). Democratic consolidation in Taiwan in comparative perspective. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 1 (1): 44-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891115620683
Menzies, G. (2013). 1421: el año en que China descubrió al mundo. Debolsillo.
Min Kuo, C. H. (2004). Taiwan. En Worldmark Encyclopedia of the Nations (vol. 4, pp. 645-659). Gale.
Neumann, I. B. y Gstöhl, S. (2006). Introduction: Lilliputians in Gulliver’s world? En C. Ingebritsen, I. Neumann y S. Gstöhl (Eds.). Small States in International Relations (pp. 3-36). University of Washington Press.
Nien-chung, C. (2016). China’s new foreign policy under Xi Jinping. Asian Security, 12 (2): 82-91. DOI:10.1080/14799855.2016.1183195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2016.1183195
Özlük, E. y Murat, C. (2010). Burying sovereignty in its birth place: Back to the middle age. En S. F. Krishna-Hense (Ed.), Order and Disorder in the International System (pp. 171-182). Routledge.
Parker, G. (1998). Geopolitics: Past, present and Future. Routledge.
Pelosi, N. (2022, 2 de agosto). Nancy Pelosi: Por esto estoy liderando una delegación del Congreso estadounidense a Taiwán. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/es/post-opinion/2022/08/03/nancy-pelosi-taiwan-visitachina-razones-articulo/
Pew Research Center (2020). En Taiwan, Views of Mainland China Mostly Negative. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/05/PG_2020.05.12_Taiwan_final.pdf
Price, R. M. y Reus-Smit, C. (1998). Dangerous liaisons? Constructivism and critical international theory. European Journal of International Relations, 4, 259-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066198004003001
República de Taiwán (2022). National Statistics: Population and Housing. https://eng.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=41871&ctNode=2815&mp=5
Restad, H. E. (2020). What makes America great? Donald Trump, national identity, and U.S. foreign policy. Global Affairs, 6 (1): 21-36. DOI:10.1080/23340460.2020.1734955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2020.1734955
Reus-Smith, C. (2005). Constructivism. En S. Burchill, A. Linklater y R. Devetak (Eds.), Theories of International Relations (pp. 188-210). Palgrave MacMillan.
Rigger, S (2011). Why Taiwan Matters: Small Island, Global Power. Rowman and Littlefield.
Rupert, M. (2013). Marxism. En T. Dunne, M. Kurki, y S. Smith (Eds.), International Relations Theories Discipline and Diversity (pp. 153-170). Oxford University Press.
Saurin, J. (2006). International relations as imperial illusion; or, the need of decolonize IR. En B. G. Jones (Ed.), Decolonizing International Relations (pp. 23-42). Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Skoggard, I. (2001). Taiwan. En C. R. Ember y M. Ember (Eds.), Countries and Their Cultures (Vol. 4, pp. 2161-2176). Macmillan Publishers.
Slomp, G. (2008). On Sovereignty. En T. C. Salmon y M. F. Imber (eds.), Issues in International Relations (pp. 33-46). Routledge.
Stevens, P. (2016). Democracy and national destinies on Taiwan. Nations and Nationalism, 22 (4): 666-685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12250
Sutch, P. y Elias, J. (2007). International Relations: The Basics. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203960936
The Taiwan Affairs Office and The Information Office of the State Council (2000, 17 de mayo). White Paper—The One-China Principle and the Taiwan Issue. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/ceno/eng/ztxw/twwt/t110655.htm
Vasu, N., Chin, Y. y Law, K. (2013). Introduction: Un/ settled narrations. En N. Vasu, Y. Chin y K. Law (Eds.), Nationalism in the Asia Pacific. Nation, national narratives and Communities in Asia Pacific (pp. 12-17). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315886695
Wachman, A. (1994) Taiwan: National Identity and Democratization. M. E. Sharpe.
Wang, T. Y. (2000). One China, one Taiwan: An analysis of the democratic progressive party’s China policy. Journal of Asian & African Studies, 35 (1): 159-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002190960003500109
Wang, A., Wu, C., Yeh, Y. y Chen, F. (2018, 10 de noviembre). What does the 1992 Consensus mean to citizens in Taiwan? The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2018/11/what-doesthe-1992-consensus-mean-to-citizens-in-taiwan/
Wei, C. y Lai, C. J. (2017). Identities, rationality and Taiwan’s China policy: The dynamics of cross-strait exchanges. Asian Studies Review, 41 (1): 136-154. DOI: 10.1080/10357823.2016.1263276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2016.1263276
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46 (2): 391-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764
Wendt, A. (1994). Collective identity formation and the international state. The American Political Science Review, 88 (2): 384-396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2944711
Wilkinson, P. (2007). International Relations: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192801579.001.0001
Wills, J. E. (2007). The seventeenth-century transformations: Taiwan under the Dutch and the Cheng regime. En M. A. Rubinstein (Ed.), Taiwan, A New History (pp. 84-106). M. E. Sharpe. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003075530-4
Wong, T. K. (2001). From ethnic to civic nationalism: The formation and changing nature of Taiwanese identity. Asian Perspective, 25 (3): 175-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2001.0017
Ying, W. (2014). ¿Qué significa ser taiwanés? Prespectiva Global, 2 (2): 89-96.
Zhong, Y. (2016). Explaining national identity shift in Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China, 25 (99): 336- 352. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2015.1104866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1104866
Citado por
