Neurotecnologías y neuroderechos: una revisión a propósito de la reforma constitucional chilena
Neurotechonologies and Neurorights: A Review on the Occasion of Chilean Constitutional Reform
Barra lateral del artículo
PDF
FLIP
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Los dispositivos neurotecnológicos que comunican el cerebro y las computadoras son el resultado de la aplicación de las teorías clásicas de la información al terreno de la neurología. Tal cuestión plantea una serie de desafíos que deben enfrentarse normativamente desde el derecho. Este trabajo intenta describir los sistemas tecnológicos que hacen necesaria la configuración de neuroderechos, así como dar cuenta de los primeros efectos de la reforma constitucional que los introdujo en el ordenamiento jurídico chileno.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Referencias (VER)
Airbib, Michael, Boniauto, James, From Neuron to Cognition Via Computational Neuroscience, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT University Press = Kindle, 2016.
Amunátegui Perelló, Carlos, “Natural and Artificial Neural Networks: The Chilean Framework”, Journal of Civil Law Studies, 14, 1, 2022, 355-366.
Benabid, Alim Louis, “Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease”, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 6, 2003, 696-706.
Bublitz, Jan-Christoph, “My Mind is Mine!? Cognitive Liberty as a Legal Concept”, en Hildt, E. y Franke, A. G. (eds.), Cognitive Enhancement. An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Dordrecht, Springer, 2013, 233-264.
Caruso, Gregg D., Neurolaw, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2024.
Chaudhary, Ujwal; Vlachos, Ioannis; Zimmermann, Jonas B. et al., “Spelling Interface Using Intracortical Signals in a Completely Locked-in Patient Enabled Via Auditory Neurofeedback Training”, Nature Communications, 13, 2022, 1-9.
Cohen, David, “Magnetoencephalography: Evidence of Magnetic Fields Produced by Alpharhythm Currents”, Science, 161, 1968, 784-786.
Conway, Flo y Siegelman, Jim, The Dark Hero of Information Age. In Search of Norbert Wiener the Father of Cybernetics, Basic Books, 2005.
Cornejo-Plaza, Maria Isabel; Cippitani, Roberto y Pasquino, Vincenzo, “Chilean Supreme Court Ruling on the Protection of Brain Activity”, Frontiers in Psycho-logy, 15:1330439, 2024, 1-9.
Défossez, Alexandre; Caucheteux, Charlotte; Rapin, Jérémy et al., Decoding Speech from Non-Invasive Brain Recordings, 2022, disponible en: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.01685 [consultado el 27 de junio de 2024].
Farahany, Nita A., The Battle for your Brain, Nueva York, St. Martin’s Press, 2023.
Greely, Hanry T. et al., “Neuroethics Guiding Principles for the NIH brain Initiative”, The Journal of Neuroscience, 38, 50, 2018, 10586-10588.
Heims, Steve Joshua, The Cybernetics Group, Cambridge, MIT University Press, 1991.
Ienca, Marcello y Andorno, Roberto, “Towards New Human Rights in the Age of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology”, Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 13, 2, 2017, 1-27.
Ienca, Marcello, Committee on Bioethics, Council of Europe, Common Human Rights Challenges Raised by Different Applications of Neurotechnologies in the Biomedical Fields [en línea], 11, 2021, disponible en: https://perma.cc/lvu9-8Y3H [consultado el 27 de junio de 2024].
Kandel, Eric R. y Shadlen, M., “The Brain and Behaviour”, en Kandel, E.; Koester, J. D.; Mack, S. H. y Siegelbaum, S. A., Principles of Neural Science, 6.ª ed., Nueva York, McGraw-Hill LLC, 2021, 7-25.
Lauterbur, Paul C., “Image Formation by Induced Local Interactions: Examples Employing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance”, Nature, 242, 1973, 190-191.
McCulloch, Warren y Pitts, Walter, “A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity”, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 52, 1-2, 1943-1990.
Millet, Juliette; Caucheteux, Charlotte et al., “Toward a Realistic Model of Speech Processing in the Brain with Self-supervised Learning” [en línea], 2022, dispo-nible en: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.01685 [consultado el 27 de junio de 2024].
Parvizi, Josef y Kastner, Sabine, “Human Intracranial EEG: Promises and Limitations”, Nature Neuroscience, 21, 2018, 474-483.
Pignatel, Laura, L’émergence d’un neurodroit, París, Dalloz, 2021.
Pine, Jerome, “A History of MEA Development”, en Baudry, Michael y Taketani, Makoto (eds.), Advances in Network Electrophysiology Using Multi-Electode Arrays, Nueva York, Springer, 2006, 3-23.
Reche Tello, Nuria, Mens iura fundamentalia. La neurotecnología ante la Constitución, Sal José de Costa Rica, Colex, 2024.
Roskies, Adina, “Neuroethics for the New Millenium”, Neuron, 35, 1, 2002, 21-23.
Searle, John, Making the Social World. The Structure of Human Civilization, Oxford University Press, Nueva York, 2010.
Seymour, Robert; Maguire, Eleanor et al., “Using OPMs to Measure Neural Activity in Standing, Mobile Participants”, Neuroimage, 244, 2021, 1-11.
Shadlen, Michael y Kandel, Eric R., “Neural Circuitry and Behavior”, en Kandel, Eric R.; Koester, John D.; Mack, Sarah H. y Siegelbaum, Steven A., Principles of Neural Science, 6.ª ed., McGraw-Hill LLC, 2021, 73-96.
Shen, Guohua; Dwivedi, Kshitij et al., “End-to-End Deep Image Reconstruction from Human Brain Activity”, Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 13, 21, 2019, 1-11.
Shenoy, Krishna V., “Brain-Machine Interfaces”, en Kandel, Eric; Koester, John D.; Mack, Sarah H. y Siegelbaum, Steven A., Principles of Neural Science, 6.ª ed., Nueva York, McGraw-Hill LLC, 2021, 953-973.
Shah, Nirao y Sanes, Joshua, “Development and Emergence of Behavior”, en Kandel, Eric R.; Koester, John D.; Mack, Sarah H. y Siegelbaum, Steven A., Principles of Neural Science, Nueva York, McGraw-Hill LLC, 2021.
Shohamy, Daphna y Turk-Browne, Nicholas, “Imaging and Behavior”, en Kandel, Eric R.; Koester, John D.; Mack, Sarah H. y Siegelbaum, Steven A., Principles of Neural Science, 6.ª ed., McGraw-Hill LLC, 2021, 111-132.
Standaert, Michael, “Chinese Primary School Halts Trial of Device that Monitors Pupils’ Brainwaves” [en línea], The Guardian, 1 de noviembre de 2019, disponible en: https://perma.cc/6PB7-RLGF [consultado el 27 de junio de 2024].
Stone, James L. y Hughes, John R., “Early History of Electroencephalography and Establishment of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society”, Clinical Neurophysiology, 20, 2013, 28-44.
Taylor, J. Sherrod; Harp, J. Anderson y Elliott, Tyron, “Neuropsychologists and Neurolawyers”, Neuropsychology, 5, 4, 1991, 293-305.
Vidal, Jacques, “Toward Direct Brain-Computer Communication”, Annual Review of Biophysics, 157, 2, 1973, 157-180.
Von Neumann, John, First Draft on the Report on the EDVAC [en línea], 1945, disponible en: http://abelgo.cn/cs101/papers/Neumann.pdf [consultado el 27 de junio de 2024].
Winning, Jason y Bechtel, William, “Information-Theoretic Philosophy of Mind”, en Floridi, L., The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Information, Londres- Nueva York, Routledge, 2016.
Yuste, Rafael y Goering, Sara, “Four Ethical Priorities for Neurotechnologies and IA”, Nature, 551, 2017, 159-163.
Zuñiga Fajuri, Alejandra; Villavicencio Miranda, Luis; Zaror Miralles, Danielle y Salas Venegas, Ricardo, “De la trivialidad de los neuroderechos”, Bits de Ciencia, 22, 2022, 24-29.
Zúñiga-Fajuri, Alejandra; Villavicencio Miranda, Luis; Zaror Miralles, Danielle y Salas Venegas, Ricardo, “Neurorights in Chile: Between Neuroscience and Legal Science”, Developments in Neuroethics and Bioethics (Elsevier), 2021, vol. 4, 165-180.
Citado por
